Dallas Jury Awards $46,240 in Cement Truck Negligence
A man was working at a construction site when a cement truck he was near began to roll backward. He jumped out of the way but hit his knee on a steel bar. He sued the truck driver and company, alleging negligence. The defendants admitted negligence but argued the man was also at fault. The man sustained a knee injury, including a torn meniscus and aggravated arthritis.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $46,240
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Knee Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Meniscus, Tear, Knee
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $46,240 is near the median of $37,329 for knee injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,500 to $82,795, based on 16 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In May 2013, a laborer at a Dallas job site sustained a right knee injury when a cement truck, supplied by a defendant company, unexpectedly moved backward. The plaintiff was behind the truck, which an employee had allegedly left in reverse without the parking brake engaged. To avoid being struck, the plaintiff jumped, hitting his knee on a steel bar. The plaintiff sued the cement supplier and its employee for negligence, alleging failure to secure the truck while knowing workers were nearby. The plaintiff claimed the incident caused a bone bruise, a medial collateral ligament sprain, a torn meniscus, and exacerbated pre-existing arthritis, ultimately requiring arthroscopic surgery. The defendants admitted their employee's negligence but argued the plaintiff was comparatively negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout. They disputed the extent of injuries, with their expert and two of the plaintiff's earlier treating physicians asserting the meniscus tear was a pre-existing degenerative condition unrelated to the accident.
After a three-day trial, a jury found the defendant employee negligent and awarded the plaintiff $46,240. Jurors indicated they believed the plaintiff was injured but found insufficient evidence to award the full cost of the surgery. They also stated the defense expert's testimony lacked credibility due to the significant payment received for his services.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.