Dallas Jury Awards $32,869 in Underinsured Motorist Claim
One driver rear-ended another driver in stopped traffic. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The case went to trial on underinsured motorist benefits. The jury awarded damages for medical costs, pain, and impairment.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $53,610
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $53,610 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 8, 2015, a vehicle collision occurred in Dallas, Texas, when a minivan rear-ended a compact car traveling south on Preston Road. The plaintiff, a court reporter and real estate agent, claimed to have sustained neck and back injuries in the incident.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the minivan driver, the vehicle owners, and her own insurer. She alleged negligence against the driver and sought underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from her insurer. Extra-contractual claims against the insurer were abated and severed. The driver and vehicle owners did not appear in court, and the case proceeded to trial solely against the insurer on the UIM claim. The insurer stipulated to the driver's negligence, focusing the trial on the issues of causation and damages.
The plaintiff sought chiropractic treatment the day after the accident for diagnosed cervical and lumbar sprains and strains. She underwent X-rays and an MRI, which reportedly showed a disc bulge and protrusion. She claimed ongoing hand numbness and tingling, lower back pain, and difficulty typing. The plaintiff sought $13,610 for past medical costs, along with damages for future medical care, and past and future pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. The defense, representing the insurer, argued that the incident involved a low-speed impact, citing minor vehicle damage, no airbag deployment, and the plaintiff's ability to drive from the scene without immediate medical attention. The defense also noted that the plaintiff's chiropractor was attorney-referred, no injections were recommended, and her return to treatment occurred after her deposition. It was argued that the injuries were minor soft-tissue conditions, the plaintiff had reached maximum medical improvement months after the incident, and the requested past medical costs were unreasonable and unnecessary. A defense chiropractic expert supported these contentions, also denying the need for future treatment.
A jury awarded the plaintiff $53,610. However, the plaintiff's recovery was limited to her $30,000 underinsured motorist policy limit, plus taxable costs of $2,869.29. The final judgment totaled $32,869.29.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.