Dallas County Jury Awards $250,000 in Insurance Bad Faith
One driver changed lanes, struck another vehicle, and then hit a third driver's car. The first driver was found at fault. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. The case involved claims against the at-fault driver's insurance, the injured driver's underinsured motorist coverage, and allegations of bad faith and unfair practices by the insurer and its adjuster.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Neck Injury (Whiplash) Injuries
Whiplash is a neck injury caused by rapid back-and-forth movement of the head, commonly occurring in rear-end collisions. Despite being frequently dismissed, whiplash can cause significant pain and disability.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $250,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2024
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Insurance Code violations, Underinsured Motorist
Settlement Context
This settlement of $250,000 is above the median of $13,969 for neck injury (whiplash) cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $2,500 to $66,600, based on 38 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In April 2016, a traffic collision occurred in Dallas County when an at-fault driver changed lanes, struck another vehicle, and then collided with the plaintiff’s vehicle. Police determined the at-fault driver was responsible. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. The at-fault driver had a $30,000 liability policy, which settled before trial. The plaintiff also had a $100,000 underinsured motorist (UIM) policy with the insurer.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the at-fault driver's negligence, the insurer's liability for UIM benefits, and that the insurer and its adjuster violated the Texas Insurance Code, including claims of bad faith. The extracontractual claims against the insurer and adjuster were severed from the UIM claim. In the UIM claim, the insurer stipulated that the at-fault driver's negligence caused the collision, and the case proceeded to trial solely on damages in October 2022. A jury determined the plaintiff's damages totaled $80,000, for future medical expenses only. After applying all credits, the insurer owed the plaintiff $40,000 under the UIM policy. The judgment, which included an award of attorney fees and costs totaling over $272,000, was subsequently appealed.
The extracontractual claims went to trial in August 2024. The jury was instructed that, based on the UIM verdict, the insurer owed the plaintiff $40,000. The plaintiff argued that a 2019 settlement demand, which included documentation supporting over $438,000 in past and future medical expenses, received no offer from the insurer or adjuster. The defense asserted that the prior liability settlement fully compensated the plaintiff and that adjusters reasonably exercise their own judgment regarding medical charges without requiring expert input.
The jury found that the insurer and the adjuster engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, and that the insurer's conduct was committed knowingly. The jury awarded the plaintiff $10,000 in damages attributed to the adjuster and $20,000 attributed to the insurer for wrongfully withheld policy benefits. An additional $20,000 was awarded because the insurer's conduct was committed knowingly. The jury also awarded $200,000 for attorney fees through trial, bringing the plaintiff's total award for the extracontractual claims to $250,000.
Understanding This Case
- Most whiplash injuries improve within 2-3 months. However, about 25% of patients experience chronic symptoms lasting over a year, significantly impacting quality of life.
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2024, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.