Dallas County Jury Awards $159,034 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped or slowing due to debris in the road when another vehicle rear-ended them. The collision caused the first vehicle to spin and go off the road. One occupant claimed soft-tissue injuries, while the other claimed head and neck injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Head/Brain Injury Injuries
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) range from mild concussions to severe brain damage. Car accidents are a leading cause of TBI, with effects ranging from temporary symptoms to permanent cognitive impairment.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $159,034
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $159,034 is near the median of $1,893,000 for head/brain injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $93,169 to $9,140,000, based on 45 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In September 2012, a rear-end collision occurred in Dallas County when the plaintiff driver, a 70-year-old retiree, slowed her sedan for a tire tread in the roadway. The defendant driver, operating a pickup truck within the scope of his employment with the corporate defendant, subsequently rear-ended the sedan, causing it to spin twice and exit the road. The plaintiff driver sustained head and neck injuries, and the plaintiff passenger, in his late 40s, claimed soft-tissue injuries. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant driver and the corporate defendant, alleging negligence including failure to keep a proper lookout, control speed, and brake in time. An individual corporate president was initially named but later nonsuited.
The plaintiffs contended that the defendant driver was negligent and inconsiderate after the accident, noting he prioritized checking his own truck and dog before approaching their vehicle. They claimed the plaintiff driver was trapped inside her vehicle and that the defendant driver merely stated an ambulance was en route before returning to his truck. The plaintiff driver, who was admitted to the hospital a few days after the incident due to disorientation, claimed post-concussion syndrome and sought non-economic damages for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. The plaintiff passenger sought damages for past medical bills totaling $9,034.
The defense denied negligence, arguing the accident was unavoidable. The defendant driver contended that the plaintiff driver braked unexpectedly and that he reacted reasonably to avoid the collision. He also denied being rude, stating he called an ambulance and observed no apparent injuries when he approached their vehicle. The defense further disputed that the accident caused the plaintiff driver's injuries, pointing to negative diagnostic tests for both plaintiffs and suggesting a pre-existing heart condition might have caused her symptoms.
Following a trial, a jury found the defendant driver negligent. The jury, in a 10-2 poll, awarded the plaintiffs $159,034. This total included $9,034 for the plaintiff passenger's past medical costs and $150,000 for the plaintiff driver's non-economic damages, encompassing past and future physical impairment, and past and future physical pain and mental anguish.
Understanding This Case
- Most mild TBIs resolve within weeks to months. Moderate to severe TBI often results in permanent impairment affecting cognition, behavior, and physical function.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, head, and neck. The other driver's insurance paid some of its policy limit. The injured driver then sued their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits, claiming their damages exceeded the amount recovered. The defense conceded fault for the accident, and the trial focused on the extent of the injuries.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.