Dallas County Jury Awards $11,724 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed back sprains and strains, and pain that affected daily activities. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing or minor, and that the other driver stopped suddenly. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $11,724
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $11,724 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On July 11, 2011, a rear-end collision occurred on the Dallas North Tollway in Dallas County during rush hour traffic. The plaintiff, a 60-year-old merchandiser, was driving a 2010 Ford Edge when the defendant, driving a 2011 Toyota Camry, struck the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle. No police report was filed following the incident. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent by failing to keep a proper lookout, driving too fast, failing to maintain an assured clear distance, and failing to take proper evasive action. The plaintiff also claimed to have seen the defendant looking down before the impact.
The defendant denied negligence, asserting that the plaintiff came to a sudden stop and that she was unable to avoid the accident. The defendant also denied looking down prior to the collision. The plaintiff claimed lower back sprains and strains from the accident, seeking chiropractic treatment 27 times over several months. While X-rays and MRIs were largely negative, the plaintiff reported ongoing pain, difficulty with daily activities, and an inability to perform hobbies. Medical bills totaled $11,599, and the plaintiff sought additional damages for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. The defense contended that any injuries were pre-existing, citing a 2001 on-the-job back injury and a subsequent on-the-job back injury after the collision with the defendant. The defense also argued the impact was minor, noting vehicle repairs cost approximately $1,600 and no ambulance responded to the scene.
After a one-day trial and 30 minutes of jury deliberation, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $11,724. This total included $7,724 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, and $2,000 for past physical pain and mental anguish.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.