Corpus Christi Jury Awards $43.6 Million in Parking Lot Negligence
An elderly woman was struck by a truck in a store parking lot. She sustained multiple fractures and injuries, requiring extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation. The woman sued the store and the driver, alleging negligence. A jury found the store 75% at fault for negligence and gross negligence, awarding the woman $43.6 million.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $43,600,000
- County
- Nueces County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Catastrophic Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Pedestrian collision
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $43,600,000 is above the median of $11,275,666 for catastrophic injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $3,260,000 to $15,400,000, based on 11 cases in our database.
Case Overview
An elderly woman was severely injured after being struck by a truck in the parking lot of a Wal-Mart in Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 27, 2014. The 78-year-old plaintiff sustained multiple fractures and a severe ankle injury, requiring extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation. She subsequently filed suit in the District Court of Nueces County against Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC and the driver of the truck.
The plaintiff alleged the driver's negligence in failing to maintain a proper lookout, yield the right-of-way, control speed, and brake. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC was accused of gross negligence for lacking stop signs in congested parking lot areas. The plaintiff sought actual and punitive damages; both defendants denied negligence and disputed the damages claim.
During the five-day trial, a traffic engineer for the plaintiff testified that the lack of stop signs or markings created an unreasonable risk of injury to customers. Wal-Mart's traffic engineering expert countered that the area was not unreasonably dangerous, while its accident reconstruction expert opined that the incident's outcome might have still occurred even if the driver had come to a stop.
The jury deliberated for two hours before finding unanimously for the plaintiff. The jury assigned Wal-Mart 75% fault for negligence and comparative responsibility, with the remaining fault assigned to the plaintiff. Wal-Mart was also found grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $43.6 million, which included $13.6 million in actual damages and $30 million in punitive damages.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Nueces County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Nueces County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.