Corpus Christi Jury Awards $36.2M in Product Liability Fire
A fire started in a home, leading to the deaths of two elderly residents. The fire was believed to have originated from a ceramic heater. The family of the deceased sued the heater manufacturer, alleging a manufacturing defect caused the fire. The defense argued the heater was not defective and pointed to other potential ignition sources. The jury found the manufacturer liable for the deaths.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $36,240,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- burns, other, death
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $36,240,000 is near the median of $36,240,000 for burns / lacerations cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $9,605,000 to $41,936,423, based on 5 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 3, 2016, an 89-year-old retiree and his 86-year-old wife died in a house fire at their home in Corpus Christi. The fire originated in the wife's bedroom, where a ceramic air heater, imported by Lasko Products LLC, was present. The decedents' adult children subsequently sued Lasko, alleging a manufacturing defect in the heater caused the fatal blaze.
Plaintiffs presented expert testimony identifying an electrical defect and internal arcing within the heater as the fire's cause. Their cause and origin expert concluded the heater was the sole ignition source, an opinion partially supported by a fire department investigator. Evidence of the defendant's internal reports on imported heaters not meeting specifications was also introduced.
The defendant, Lasko, denied a manufacturing defect, citing no fire complaints among 1.3 million imported heaters and detailing its inspection protocols. A defense expert argued ceramic heaters could not fail as alleged, explaining their inherent safety. The defense also noted the fire department's report listed the fire's cause as undetermined due to multiple potential ignition sources, including an electric adjustable bed and a power strip. The defense questioned the plaintiff's expert's methodology and the heater's long operational history.
After a seven-day trial, a jury found Lasko liable for the decedents' deaths. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $36,240,000. This included damages for pain and mental anguish, medical and funeral expenses for both estates, and significant awards for the surviving children for loss of companionship, society, and mental anguish.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.