Burnet County Negligent Auto Repair Fire Injury Settles
One driver was traveling on a highway during a rainstorm when another driver struck their vehicle. The collision caused the vehicle to catch fire, and the occupants sustained severe injuries, including burns and crush injuries. The occupants sued the collision center that had previously repaired the car's roof, alleging negligent repair compromised the vehicle's structural integrity and led to the fire and their injuries. The defense argued the other driver was solely responsible for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $41,936,423
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Contusion, Pulmonary, Burns
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $41,936,423 is above the median of $36,240,000 for burns / lacerations cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $9,605,000 to $41,936,423, based on 5 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On December 21, 2013, two plaintiffs were involved in a collision with another driver on U.S. Route 281 North in Burnet County, Texas. The plaintiffs, driving a Honda Fit sedan, were struck during a rainstorm. Their vehicle subsequently caught fire, and one plaintiff sustained severe burns while trapped inside, along with multiple fractures and other injuries. The second plaintiff suffered various severe crush injuries and internal trauma.
The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against a collision center, alleging negligent repair of their vehicle. They claimed the collision center, which had replaced the car's roof 13 months prior, used adhesive glue instead of welding it, compromising the vehicle's structural integrity and contributing to the fire and the severity of their injuries. Plaintiffs' accident reconstruction and biomechanical experts testified that the improper repair caused the roof to buckle and separate, leading to structural failures and the fuel tank being struck, which amplified the injuries. The defense denied negligence, asserting that the accident was unavoidable due to the severe rainstorm and the force of the impact would have caused the same injuries regardless of the roof repair method. Defense experts contended that glue was as strong as welds and that the injuries resulted from deceleration, not structural collapse.
The jury found the collision center 75 percent negligent and the non-party driver 25 percent negligent. A total award of $41,936,423 was determined, which was reduced to $31,452,317 due to comparative fault. The case later settled under a confidential high/low agreement.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.