Baytown, Texas Rear-End Collision Injury Case Settles for $4,200
One driver stopped in traffic and was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit sought damages for pain, medical expenses, and lost wages. The other driver claimed the injured party was also at fault. The case was settled for $4,200.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $4,200
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This settlement of $4,200 is below the median of $15,103 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $6,150 to $50,000, based on 95 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On July 1, 2017, a vehicle carrying the plaintiff and two minor plaintiffs was rear-ended by the defendant's vehicle on Crosby Cedar Bayou in Baytown, Texas, after stopping in traffic. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit on January 24, 2019, alleging the defendant's negligence, specifically citing failure to yield, maintain a proper lookout, brake, and control speed. The suit sought damages for physical pain, mental anguish, medical expenses, physical impairment, and lost wages.
The defendant responded on August 2, 2019, denying fault and asserting defenses such as the plaintiff's comparative responsibility, negligence per se, sudden emergency, and unavoidable accident. The defendant also claimed any injuries were pre-existing or subsequent conditions and sought credit for prior payments. The plaintiff later sought a non-suit without prejudice against the defendant, which the court granted on June 10, 2020.
However, the case continued for the minor plaintiffs, with a guardian ad litem appointed. On November 15, 2022, the court approved a compromise settlement of $4,200.00. This amount was allocated among the minor plaintiffs, Medicaid for one minor, the plaintiffs' attorney, and the guardian ad litem. All claims were dismissed with prejudice on December 12, 2022, concluding the case.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2022, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.