Arizona Jury Awards $800,000 in DUI Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another vehicle rear-ended her. The driver who caused the collision fled the scene. The injured driver identified the fleeing driver later. The injured driver suffered neck and shoulder injuries. The case proceeded to trial, and the jury awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Neck Injury (Whiplash) Injuries
Whiplash is a neck injury caused by rapid back-and-forth movement of the head, commonly occurring in rear-end collisions. Despite being frequently dismissed, whiplash can cause significant pain and disability.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $800,000
- County
- Dallas County, AZ
- Resolved
- 2009
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $800,000 is above the median of $9,367 for neck injury (whiplash) cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $3,100 to $25,000, based on 590 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while stopped at a red light. The other driver, traveling at more than 50 mph, then fled the scene. The plaintiff sustained a cervical strain and sprain, along with traumatic bilateral shoulder bursitis. She later identified the fleeing driver using vanity license plates and a company website. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was driving under the influence and failed to keep a proper lookout.
The plaintiff claimed past medical costs of approximately $8,800 and anticipated future treatment costs of $66,000 for chronic pain syndrome. As a registered nurse, she also sought about $38,600 in lost earnings. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the driver, his wife, and his business, asserting claims of negligence and driving under the influence of alcohol.
During discovery, the defendant refused to answer questions about the collision or his whereabouts, and he did not appear at trial, invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The defendants did not dispute liability but argued that the plaintiff's pain stemmed from a preexisting degenerative cervical disk disease. The court allowed the jury to consider punitive damages due to the violent nature of the collision, observations of the driver bleeding and a beer can in the vehicle, and his flight from the scene. The jury was also permitted to draw a negative inference from the defendant's refusal to testify.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, awarding $800,000, which included $300,000 in punitive damages. Post-trial motions filed by the defendants for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law concerning punitive damages were subsequently denied.
Understanding This Case
- Most whiplash injuries improve within 2-3 months. However, about 25% of patients experience chronic symptoms lasting over a year, significantly impacting quality of life.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2009, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.