Arizona Court Upholds $7,500 Arbitration in Underinsured Motorist Claim
One driver was injured in a car accident. The other driver admitted fault. The injured driver sought compensation for her injuries, claiming her medical damages were higher than the insurance policy limit. Her own insurance company covered some medical costs but disputed others, citing pre-existing injuries. The dispute went to arbitration, which awarded the injured driver $7,500. She then filed a complaint to challenge the arbitration decision, but the court denied her request.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $7,500
- County
- Maricopa County, AZ
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Knee Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Physical Injury, Economic Injury
Settlement Context
This verdict-defense of $7,500 is above the median of Undisclosed for knee injury cases resolved by verdict-defense. The typical range is Undisclosed to $3,725, based on 6 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In October 2008, a plaintiff sustained injuries in a car accident. The adverse driver admitted liability, and the plaintiff sought $15,000, the full coverage amount of the adverse driver's insurance policy, as compensation. Alleging insufficient compensation, the plaintiff filed an underinsured motorist claim with her own insurer, Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, for total medical damages of $25,524.59.
The defendant insurer agreed to cover emergency room treatment and a follow-up visit but disputed other medical expenses, including knee surgery, asserting they were not causally related to the accident due to the plaintiff's pre-existing injuries from a May 2007 slip and fall. Pursuant to an arbitration provision in the insurance contract, the parties submitted their dispute to arbitration in May 2013. The arbitrator awarded the plaintiff $7,500 in damages.
In September 2013, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County, seeking to vacate, amend, or set aside the arbitration decision. In December 2013, the court denied the plaintiff's requested relief, thereby upholding the arbitration award. The court subsequently denied the defendant insurer's request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs. The judgment was later affirmed on appeal.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Maricopa County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Maricopa County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.