Arlington, Texas Jury Awards $3,039 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver of the first vehicle claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. The child in the first vehicle claimed abdominal pain from the seat belt. The first driver sought damages for medical bills, pain, and impairment, while the child sought damages for pain and suffering. The defense argued that the injuries were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,039
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $3,039 is below the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 4, 2014, a driver and her 4-year-old daughter, acting as plaintiffs, were stopped at a red light on Sublett Road in Arlington, Texas, when their vehicle was rear-ended by a defendant driver. The impact reportedly pushed the plaintiffs' vehicle into the car ahead. The defendant later indicated he had glanced down at driving directions. The adult plaintiff claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries, while the minor plaintiff reported abdominal pain from the seat belt. The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and brake effectively.
The adult plaintiff testified that her neck and back complaints resolved with chiropractic treatment, but her right shoulder pain persisted. She had a prior work-related shoulder injury from 2012 but contended the symptoms had fully resolved. Her chiropractor opined the current injuries were caused by the accident, acknowledging that any pre-existing conditions were accelerated or exacerbated. The minor plaintiff's abdominal pain resolved soon after the accident following an emergency room visit. The plaintiffs sought over $30,000 in damages. The defense argued the adult plaintiff's shoulder problems were pre-existing, citing a prior injury or degenerative conditions, and questioned the duration of her treatment.
Following a one-day trial, the jury found the defendant negligent. The adult plaintiff was awarded $2,789 for past medical costs and $250 for past physical pain and mental anguish, totaling $3,039. The minor plaintiff received no award. The outcome suggested the jury acknowledged the defendant's negligence and some of the adult plaintiff's related medical expenses and initial pain, while likely discounting claims tied to the more complex shoulder injury due to its pre-existing nature and the limited duration of other injury treatments.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing conditions. The jury found the driver who caused the collision liable and awarded damages, but the plaintiff received nothing due to prior insurance settlements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.