Archer County Jury Awards $7,059,782.61 in Roadway Negligence
A truck driver was driving on a recently improved road when he encountered oncoming traffic. To avoid a collision, he swerved, causing his truck to overturn. The driver claimed injuries to his back and head, alleging the road construction created a dangerous condition. The case involved multiple defendants, with some settling before trial and others proceeding to a jury.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Head/Brain Injury Injuries
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) range from mild concussions to severe brain damage. Car accidents are a leading cause of TBI, with effects ranging from temporary symptoms to permanent cognitive impairment.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,059,783
- County
- Wise County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,059,783 is near the median of $1,893,000 for head/brain injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $93,169 to $9,140,000, based on 45 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 12, 2012, a loaded 18-wheeler, driven by the plaintiff, overturned on Bell Road at a wind farm construction project in Archer County. The incident occurred in a section of roadway that remained 12 to 15 feet wide without shoulders, despite most of the road having been widened to 20 feet with sloping shoulders. The plaintiff, approaching this narrow section, moved to the right to avoid an oncoming unloaded 18-wheeler and went off the roadway. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered head and back injuries.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against M.A. Mortenson Co., the general contractor, alleging negligence in roadway revision that created a dangerous condition. Also named were a subcontractor, J.H. Strain & Sons Inc. and its principal, other truckers, and their associated trucking companies, alleging negligent vehicle operation. Most defendants, including the subcontractor, other truckers, and their companies, negotiated pretrial settlements with undisclosed terms. Claims against some truckers and entities were non-suited by the plaintiff's counsel. The case proceeded to trial solely against M.A. Mortenson Co.
During the four-day trial, the plaintiff's experts testified that the unwidened section violated engineering plans and Texas Department of Transportation standards, contending M.A. Mortenson's decision to forgo widening this specific area, despite a safety director's instruction not to widen it, created an unsafe roadway with inadequate traffic control. M.A. Mortenson Co. argued that oncoming drivers violated the traffic-control plan and were solely responsible, and that the plaintiff failed to brake timely. Defense experts opined that engineering plans were followed, traffic control was adequate, and the plaintiff's claimed injuries were mild, pre-existing, or exaggerated for litigation.
After 2.25 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a 10-2 verdict, finding M.A. Mortenson Co. 75 percent negligent. The jury also assigned 10 percent negligence to the oncoming trucker, 10 percent to the plaintiff's employer, and 5 percent to Charlie Martin Trucking and its driver. The jury found no negligence on the part of the plaintiff or J.H. Strain & Sons. The plaintiff was awarded $7,059,782.61 in damages.
Understanding This Case
- Most mild TBIs resolve within weeks to months. Moderate to severe TBI often results in permanent impairment affecting cognition, behavior, and physical function.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Wise County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Wise County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, head, and neck. The other driver's insurance paid some of its policy limit. The injured driver then sued their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits, claiming their damages exceeded the amount recovered. The defense conceded fault for the accident, and the trial focused on the extent of the injuries.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.