Amarillo Court Awards $8.9 Million in Livestock Negligence
A truck carrying passengers rolled over after striking two cows that had escaped onto a dark road. The driver's son and a passerby rescued the injured passenger before the truck caught fire. The passenger sustained severe injuries, including fractures and a brain injury, and required multiple surgeries. He testified to permanent disability and ongoing pain.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $8,900,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Head, Concussion, Post-concussion Syndrome
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $8,900,000 is above the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On August 3, 2011, a rollover accident occurred on north Dovell Road outside Amarillo when a truck, carrying the plaintiff as a front-seat passenger along with his son and grandchildren, encountered five or six cows in the road. The truck struck two cows, rolled eight times, and caught fire. The plaintiff, a self-employed carpenter, was extracted by his son and a passerby before the truck exploded. The plaintiff sustained multiple severe injuries, including a skull fracture, brain swelling, numerous fractures across his arm, shoulder, and spine, and a brachial plexus injury. He was placed in a medically-induced coma for 20 days and underwent multiple surgeries, including spinal stabilization and fracture repairs.
The cows had escaped from a nearby 140-acre property owned by the defendant, a farm owner. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging negligence in failing to secure the livestock. Other parties initially named were later dismissed. The plaintiff argued the accident occurred at night on a dark road during a severe drought, which prompted cows to wander for water. A fence expert testified that the property owner violated the county's closed-range policy by using a single-strand hotwire fence instead of proper fencing. Evidence also indicated a similar accident involving wandering cows had occurred days prior. The plaintiff sought compensation for over $1 million in medical expenses, lost earnings, and significant damages for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and disfigurement, arguing permanent disability.
The defendant denied liability, maintaining that an open-range policy existed in the county, which would permit cows to wander freely. Despite this defense, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $8.9 million. The outcome likely reflected the court's finding that the defendant was negligent in maintaining adequate fencing and complying with local livestock regulations, which directly contributed to the plaintiff's severe injuries.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.