Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2019

Louisville Jury Awards $646,000 in Tractor-Trailer Collision

A tractor-trailer driver failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with a smaller car. The driver of the car was pushed approximately 70 feet. The injured driver initially treated for soft-tissue symptoms and an airbag burn, later complaining of headaches and tinnitus. Medical experts confirmed the injuries were chronic and permanent.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Truck/Commercial
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$646,000
County
Dallas County, KY
Resolved
2019

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Truck/Commercial
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $646,000 is above the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On May 10, 2017, in Louisville's West End, a tractor-trailer driver employed by a trucking company proceeded through a stop sign at the intersection of River Park Drive and 32nd Street without stopping, reportedly traveling at an estimated 25 mph. The tractor-trailer collided with a sedan, striking its passenger side and pushing the vehicle approximately 70 feet. The sedan's driver initially sought treatment for soft-tissue symptoms and an airbag burn, later reporting ongoing headaches and tinnitus, which an ENT confirmed as chronic and permanent injuries linked to the crash.

The sedan's driver filed a lawsuit in Jefferson Circuit Court, which was subsequently removed to federal court, seeking damages for past and future pain and suffering from the tractor-trailer driver and the trucking company. While the trucking company admitted its driver's fault in the collision, it also argued that the sedan's driver shared some responsibility for failing to take evasive action. The defense further contended that the plaintiff's injuries were transitory and minimized the claimed damages, having previously made an offer of judgment for $75,000.

A jury found that the sedan's driver was not at fault for the incident. For damages, the jury awarded the plaintiff $16,000 for past pain and suffering and an additional $630,000 for future pain and suffering, resulting in a total verdict of $646,000. A judgment consistent with the verdict was entered.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

37
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to understand your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$12,637
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.

Dallas County • 2019
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.

Dallas County • 2020
View full case
$2,650
Settlement
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.

Dallas County • 2017
View full case
$28,412
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.

Tarrant County • 2021
View full case
$49,271
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.

Hidalgo County • 2019
View full case