Kentucky Jury Awards $100,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was injured in a rear-end collision while waiting in stopped traffic. The impact caused significant vehicle damage. The injured driver sought damages for soft-tissue injuries, migraines, and a disc herniation. The jury awarded damages for medical bills and pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $100,000
- County
- Dallas County, KY
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $100,000 is above the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On July 20, 2008, a passenger was injured in a rear-end collision in stopped traffic in Kentucky. The at-fault driver's liability for the moderate to severe impact was not disputed. The plaintiff sought emergency treatment for soft-tissue symptoms and later underwent chiropractic care for several months. Approximately two years later, the plaintiff received treatment for migraine headaches, and a small C5-6 disc herniation was also identified.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages from the at-fault driver and her underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier, Auto-Owners Insurance. The plaintiff sought approximately $39,000 for medical expenses, $30,000 for future care, and $225,000 for pain and suffering. A neurologist from Lexington, Kentucky, testified as the plaintiff's expert, linking the strain injury and 80% of the migraines to the crash. The UIM carrier presented testimony from a neurosurgeon, also from Lexington, who found no disc herniation, disputed the crash-relation of the migraines, and opined that the plaintiff's soft-tissue injury should have resolved within three months.
The at-fault driver settled for the $50,000 policy limits, and the UIM carrier elected to substitute the limits. In 2016, the trial court dismissed the at-fault driver from the case, ruling that the UIM carrier's failure to file a timely subrogation cross-claim resulted in the expiration of the statute of limitations. The case proceeded to trial against Auto-Owners Insurance alone. A jury awarded the plaintiff $25,000 for medical bills and $75,000 for pain and suffering, totaling $100,000. The jury declined to award damages for future care. The final judgment was subject to reductions for underlying policy limits and Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits, and potentially for medical bills discharged by bankruptcy.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.