Florida Jury Issues Verdict in Rear-End Collision, Amount Undisclosed
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. A third vehicle then struck the defendant's vehicle. Liability was admitted. The injured person had carpal tunnel syndrome and a shoulder injury requiring surgery.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $105,000
- County
- Palm Beach County, FL
- Resolved
- 1997
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Shoulder Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $105,000 is near the median of $66,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $25,000 to $166,763, based on 64 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 11, 1994, a plaintiff was operating a vehicle near Glades Road and N.W. 15th Avenue when a defendant, driving a vehicle owned by a co-defendant, rear-ended the plaintiff's car. The defendant's vehicle was subsequently struck by a third vehicle. Liability for the initial collision was admitted by the defendants.
The case proceeded with a dispute over damages, as indicated by the presentation of medical expert testimony. The plaintiff presented testimony from an orthopedic surgeon in Lake Worth, Florida, and a neurologist in West Palm Beach, Florida. The defense countered with testimony from an orthopedic surgeon in Boca Raton, Florida.
Prior to trial, the defendant offered a $40,000 settlement. The record indicated no post-trial motions were filed. However, the specific details regarding the final verdict amount or settlement were not available in the provided documentation.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Palm Beach County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 1997, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Palm Beach County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.