Verdictly
Settlement
Kings County • 1998

Texas Rear-End Collision with Knee Injury Settles for $100,000

One driver was stopped at a traffic light when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The injured driver claimed a knee injury that caused permanent pain and limited their ability to work. The other driver argued the injured person did not try to lessen their damages and refused surgery. The case was settled before trial.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Knee Injury
Rear-end
MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$100,000
County
Kings County, NY
Resolved
1998

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Knee Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE, Rear End Collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $100,000 is near the median of $110,000 for knee injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $11 to $375,000, based on 10 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff driver in a small truck contended that a defendant delivery truck driver struck their vehicle from the rear while stopped at a traffic light. The plaintiff asserted a full tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in their knee, claiming permanent pain and restriction. The plaintiff also alleged an inability to continue their prior job, resulting in reduced earning capacity and being relegated to part-time work.

The defendant maintained that the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages by declining recommended surgery. However, the plaintiff countered that a procedure was anticipated, and their orthopedist testified that permanent symptoms and traumatic arthritis would nonetheless develop. The parties reached a settlement of $100,000 prior to trial.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Kings County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 1998, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

94
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Kings County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case