Verdictly
Verdict-Defense
Queens County • 2019

Texas Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision, Plaintiff Awarded $25K

One driver alleged they were stopped at an intersection when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The defense denied negligence and challenged the extent of the injuries. A jury found the accident was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Defense
Amount
$25,000
County
Queens County, NY
Resolved
2019

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision

Settlement Context

This verdict-defense of $25,000 is above the median of Undisclosed for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-defense. The typical range is Undisclosed to Undisclosed, based on 56 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On August 8, 2016, a plaintiff's vehicle was struck from the rear by an SUV operated by the defendants while stopped at an intersection. The impact propelled the plaintiff's vehicle into the intersection. The plaintiff later alleged to have sustained moderate cervical spine injuries and significant lumbar spine injuries, including a herniated disc and radiculopathy.

The plaintiff filed a motor vehicle negligence lawsuit, claiming the defendants were negligent in the operation of their vehicle. The defense denied the negligence allegations, challenged the severity of the alleged damages, and argued for comparative negligence. Prior to a full trial, the parties agreed to submit the case to a summary jury trial, with the proceedings focused solely on the issue of liability and causation.

On October 30, 2019, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the defendant, concluding that the accident was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's alleged injuries. In accordance with a pre-trial high/low agreement set at $300,000/$25,000, the plaintiff was awarded $25,000.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Queens County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

59
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Queens County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case