Texas Jury Awards $213,750 in Double-Parked Rear-End Collision
One driver's car was hit from behind while double parked with hazard lights on. The other driver claimed the first car pulled out into traffic. The jury found the first driver 70% at fault and the second driver 30% at fault. The jury awarded damages for past pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $213,750
- County
- Queens County, NY
- Resolved
- 2014
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $213,750 is near the median of $60,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $229,900, based on 396 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A vehicle collision led to a lawsuit between two drivers following an incident in front of an apartment building. The plaintiff contended her vehicle was double-parked with hazard lights activated for approximately 15 to 20 minutes when it was struck from the rear by the defendant's vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to make adequate observations prior to the impact.
The defendant disputed the plaintiff's account, arguing the plaintiff's vehicle was moving from its double-parked position and veered into traffic, making the collision unavoidable. An eyewitness corroborated the defendant's version of events, stating the plaintiff's vehicle was pulling from a parked position. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered an L5-S1 herniation requiring fusion surgery and the insertion of a cage, anticipating permanent symptoms. The plaintiff further contended the injury exacerbated a pre-existing weight condition, leading to difficulties with ambulation and subsequent gastric bypass surgery.
The parties participated in a Summary Jury Trial under a high-low agreement of $70,000/$700,000. The jury found the defendant 70% negligent and the plaintiff 30% comparatively negligent. They determined the plaintiff sustained a significant limitation of use of a body function or system but did not find a permanent consequential limitation. The jury rendered a gross award of $213,750 for past pain and suffering, declining to award for future pain and suffering.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Queens County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2014, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Queens County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.