Verdictly
Settlement
DeKalb County • 2013

Texas Multi-Vehicle Collision Settles for $308,000

One driver contended that another driver crossed the center line and hit them head-on. A third driver then hit the injured driver from behind. The injured driver claimed a torn rotator cuff and ongoing pain, limiting their ability to work. The case settled before trial.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Shoulder Injury
Multi-vehicle
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$308,000
County
DeKalb County, GA
Resolved
2013

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Shoulder Injury
Accident Type
Multi-vehicle
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Multiple Vehicle Collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $308,000 is above the median of $60,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $24,061 to $250,000, based on 20 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff driver was involved in a two-stage motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff alleged that a first defendant driver fell asleep at the wheel, crossed the center line, and caused a head-on collision. The plaintiff further contended that a co-defendant, who was following too closely, failed to make proper observations and subsequently rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle after the initial impact.

The plaintiff claimed a torn rotator cuff in the dominant arm, requiring arthroscopic surgery and potentially future procedures, which resulted in ongoing pain and physical limitations. As a contractor, the plaintiff asserted that these injuries limited the types of jobs accepted and necessitated hiring additional employees, leading to a reduction in earnings. The co-defendant denied operating negligently, stating the second impact was unavoidable after the initial collision. The case concluded with a pre-trial settlement totaling $308,000. The first defendant contributed $300,000, and the co-defendant provided $8,000.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in DeKalb County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2013, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

67
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in DeKalb County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case