Verdictly
Settlement
Alachua County • 2009

Texas Uninsured Motorist Rear-End Collision Claim Settles for $300,000

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision with another driver who did not have insurance. The injured driver filed a claim against their own insurance company. The insurance company disputed the cause and extent of the injuries. The injured driver sustained a shoulder injury that required surgery. The case went to trial, and the jury awarded damages. The case ultimately settled for a larger amount.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Shoulder Injury
Rear-end
Insurance Obligation

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$300,000
County
Alachua County, FL
Resolved
2009

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Shoulder Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Insurance Obligation, Vehicle negligence, Surgical negligence, Rear end collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $300,000 is above the median of $60,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $24,061 to $250,000, based on 20 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff, a 49-year-old manicurist, filed an uninsured motorist claim against her insurer following a rear-end collision with an uninsured driver. The plaintiff alleged the accident caused a rotator cuff tear, for which she received a surgical recommendation. Her insurer initially offered $50,000 on a $100,000 policy.

At trial, the defendant insurer disputed the causation and extent of the plaintiff's injuries, arguing that the collision resulted in only $500 in property damage and therefore was not severe enough to cause significant harm. The plaintiff presented testimony from her treating orthopedic surgeon and physiatrist, who stated the rotator cuff injury was directly caused by the accident and required surgery and treatment. The plaintiff did not claim lost wages.

A jury subsequently awarded the plaintiff $226,000 in damages. Based on a prior settlement proposal submitted by the plaintiff, the case later settled for $300,000.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Alachua County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2009, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

42
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Alachua County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case