Verdictly
Settlement
Dallas County • 2020

Wylie Jury Awards $13,478,106 in Infant Safety Seat Injury

A 10-week-old infant was in a car seat when the vehicle he was in was struck by another car. The infant sustained a skull fracture and a severe brain injury. The lawsuit alleged that the child seat's aftermarket insert contributed to the severity of the head injury. The case involved claims against the driver of the other vehicle and the manufacturer of the child seat insert.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Head/Brain Injury
Other Accident
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$13,478,106
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2020

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Head/Brain Injury
Accident Type
Other
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Overview

In December 2013, a 10-week-old infant was severely injured in a two-vehicle collision in Wylie. The infant was a passenger in a compact car driven by a third party, attempting a left turn at an intersection, when it was struck by an oncoming sedan. Police concluded the turning driver failed to yield the right of way. The infant sustained a skull fracture and severe brain injury, later requiring a permanent shunt. The child's parents, acting on their son's behalf, initially sued the driver of the oncoming sedan for negligence. They later added the manufacturer of the child safety seat, Graco Children's Products Inc., and the manufacturer of an aftermarket insert, Summer Infant (USA) Inc., as defendants, alleging design defect and misrepresentation, respectively.

The parents claimed the driver of their vehicle had a green left-turn arrow and that the oncoming sedan's driver was at fault. Regarding the injury, they argued the Summer Infant insert elevated the infant's head, effectively reducing the protective height of the Graco child seat's side wings. They alleged the insert was not adequately crash-tested, and Summer Infant's advertising was misleading. They also asserted that their child had outgrown the insert and that current safety guidelines generally discourage the use of such aftermarket products. Both Summer Infant and the sedan driver contended that the turning vehicle's driver was primarily at fault for the accident, with the sedan driver designating her as a responsible third party. Summer Infant denied the insert caused or contributed to the injuries, attributing them instead to the collision's severity and the child seat's low side wings, which their expert also noted as a potential issue. Graco Children's Products Inc. settled for a confidential amount before trial.

The jury heard arguments that the minor would require lifelong care, with estimated future expenses ranging from $13 million to $21 million. The parents requested approximately $40 million in total damages, including compensation for past and future medical expenses, pain, mental anguish, loss of earning capacity, and physical impairment for the minor, as well as mental anguish for the mother. Summer Infant disputed that the injury was unapportionable among responsible parties.

The trial proceeded against Summer Infant and the driver of the oncoming sedan. The jury found no negligence against the sedan driver. It assigned comparative responsibility of 51 percent to the turning driver for negligence, 47 percent to Graco for design defect, and 2 percent to Summer Infant for misrepresentation. The jury initially found no misrepresentation by Summer Infant, but after judicial instruction to continue deliberations due to a conflict with its comparative responsibility finding, it changed its answer to "yes." The minor plaintiff was awarded $13,478,106.19. This amount was reduced to $269,562.12 based on the comparative responsibility findings and further lowered by settlement credits. The mother received no damages for her bystander claim. The jury found that the minor's injury was capable of being apportioned among the responsible parties.

VerdictlyTM Score

50
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$97,500
Settlement
Other Injury
Other Accident
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.

Collin County • 2015
View full case
Undisclosed
Settlement
Other Injury
Other Accident
Motor Vehicle Negligence

A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.

Collin County • 2024
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Other Accident
Physical Therapy

On September 2, 2016, a collision occurred in a Plano parking lot. A plaintiff, a hotel hostess and gift-shop attendant, was driving in an aisle next to a street when a defendant, driving on the street, made a right turn into the parking lot driveway. The vehicles collided. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and knee injuries and subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The plaintiff testified that she was making a left turn at the driveway when the defendant turned into it, claiming the driveway was wide enough for two vehicles but the defendant made too wide a turn. The defendant denied making a wide turn, asserting her turn was completed when the plaintiff's vehicle scraped across her front end. Photos of vehicle damage, showing front-distributed damage to the defendant's car and left front corner to driver's door damage to the plaintiff's, were presented as evidence, which defense counsel argued supported the defendant's account. The plaintiff underwent various treatments, including emergency room care, physical therapy, pain management, and MRIs revealing a meniscus tear, disc protrusions, stenosis, and a disc bulge. She sought damages for past and future medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Defense counsel argued the impact was not major, highlighted delays and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment, and impeached the plaintiff with evidence of a prior accident and chiropractic care despite her testimony denying previous injuries. Following a one-day trial, a jury rendered a defense verdict. The jury found that neither party's negligence, if any, proximately caused the accident. Consequently, the damages question was not addressed.

Collin County • 2018
View full case
$38,843
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Other Accident
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.

Collin County • 2016
View full case
$27,255
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Other Accident
Motor Vehicle Negligence

A minor sustained back, head, and neck injuries in a motor vehicle accident in Texas. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, alleging the incident caused the injuries and seeking damages. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from a neurologist specializing in pain management, a neuropsychologist, and an economist. The defense called an expert in aerospace and occupational medicine. The case concluded with an award of $27,255.

Collin County • 2022
View full case