Texas Jury Awards $8,900.31 in Multi-Vehicle Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver collided with her vehicle. The second driver then entered oncoming traffic, overcorrected, and hit the first driver's car. The first driver sustained injuries and her car was totaled.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $48,921
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2023
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
On June 23, 2016, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on Farm to Market Road 1960 in Texas. The plaintiff was stationary at a red traffic signal in the westbound first inside lane when a collision involving two other vehicles led to her vehicle being struck. Defendant one, traveling westbound, began to enter the center turn lane to make a left turn. Defendant two, also traveling westbound in the center turn lane, then collided with defendant one. Following this initial impact, defendant two overcorrected, entered oncoming eastbound traffic, and subsequently struck the plaintiff's stationary vehicle. The plaintiff sustained bodily injuries, and her vehicle was declared a total loss.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against both defendants, alleging negligence. The claims included operating vehicles at an excessive speed, driving in a careless and reckless manner, failing to apply brakes, failing to maintain a proper lookout, and failing to keep vehicles under reasonable control. The plaintiff sought actual and punitive damages, along with interest and court costs. Both defendants filed general denials and raised defenses such as comparative causation, failure to mitigate damages, pre-existing conditions, and sudden emergency. Defendant two specifically argued that defendant one's failure to safely change lanes constituted negligence per se. During the proceedings, the court granted motions to designate defendant one as a responsible third party and to exclude an officer's opinions on causation.
After a trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on January 5, 2023. The final judgment, entered on February 21, 2023, awarded the plaintiff damages totaling $8,900.31, with $5,340.19 allocated against defendant one and $3,560.12 against defendant two. Additionally, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, as a subrogee of the plaintiff, received $3,891.65 from the defendants. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, acting as a subrogee for defendant two, was also awarded $7,330.54 against defendant one, indicating an allocation of fault between the defendants.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.