Texas Jury Awards $7,765,000 in Fatal Commercial Truck Crash
A truck driver was killed when a pickup truck crossed the center line and collided head-on with his tanker truck. The tanker truck then caught fire. The driver of the pickup truck was also killed. The survivors of the truck driver sued the pickup truck driver's employer, alleging negligence in hiring, retaining, training, and supervising the driver. The plaintiffs claimed the employer allowed the driver to operate a company vehicle without a license and failed to address issues of fatigued driving. The defense argued that the driver was not acting within the scope of his employment and that the employer had provided instructions for rest that were disregarded.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $9,605,000
- County
- Angelina County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On January 29, 2016, a head-on collision occurred on Interstate 69 near Zavalla, resulting in two fatalities. A fully loaded tanker truck, driven by the plaintiff's decedent, a 58-year-old truck driver, was traveling southbound when it was struck by a northbound pickup truck. The pickup, owned by the defendant company and driven by its employee, crossed the center line. Both drivers died, and the tanker truck subsequently caught fire. An autopsy report indicated the truck driver's death was primarily caused by carbon monoxide poisoning and secondarily by severe third-degree burns, with a biomechanical expert testifying the decedent was alive and conscious during the fire.
The decedent's survivors filed a lawsuit against the defendant company, alleging its employee was negligent by driving without a license, while fatigued, and by falling asleep at the wheel, causing him to cross the center line. They further claimed the defendant company was negligent and grossly negligent in its hiring, retention, training, and supervision practices. The plaintiffs presented evidence that the defendant company's driver had worked for over 24 hours prior to the accident, driving from Fort Worth to Beaumont for another shift before heading back to Fort Worth, and alleged the company knew about its employees driving company vehicles without licenses and failed to address fatigued driving risks.
The defendant company largely did not dispute its driver's negligence but challenged claims of its own negligence. The company's owner denied knowledge of any employee driving company vehicles without a license, stating it was against company policy. A supervisor testified that instructions were given for the crew to rest in Beaumont before returning to Fort Worth, suggesting the driver disregarded these orders and was therefore outside the course and scope of employment. A defense economist also contested the plaintiffs' calculation of pecuniary losses.
After an eight-day trial and 3.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found both the defendant company and its driver negligent, determining that their actions proximately caused the accident. The jury also concluded that the defendant company was grossly negligent and that its driver was acting within the course and scope of his employment. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $9,605,000. Following the verdict, punitive damages were capped by statute, reducing the final judgment to $7,765,000. The defense indicated an intent to file a motion for a new trial.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Angelina County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.