Texas Jury Awards $54.47M in Multi-Vehicle Collision
A 19-year-old man was a passenger in a vehicle that attempted a U-turn and was struck by another vehicle. The passenger was not wearing a seatbelt and sustained a spinal fracture that resulted in paraplegia. He sued the driver of the second vehicle and their employer, alleging negligent following distance and training. The defense argued the U-turn driver was solely responsible and that the passenger's failure to wear a seatbelt caused his injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $67,470,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 28, 2012, near Orange Grove, Texas, a passenger in a Ford Sport Trac sustained severe injuries in a multi-vehicle collision. The incident occurred when the Sport Trac's driver attempted a U-turn on FM 624, colliding with an eastbound van. The Sport Trac then spun into the path of a second eastbound vehicle, a Chevrolet Silverado owned by a corporate defendant and driven by its employee, which struck the Sport Trac on the passenger side. The passenger, who was not wearing a seatbelt, suffered a spinal fracture that resulted in paraplegia.
The plaintiff passenger sued the Silverado's driver and his employer, alleging the driver followed too closely and that the employer was negligent in training its drivers on safe following distances. A plaintiff's accident reconstruction expert testified the Silverado was likely 80 to 140 feet behind the Sport Trac, an insufficient distance according to a plaintiff's trucking safety expert. The defendants denied negligence, asserting that the Sport Trac's driver, identified as a responsible third party, was solely responsible for making an illegal U-turn without proper lookout. A defense accident reconstruction expert testified the Silverado was following at a safe distance of 220 to 410 feet. The defendants also argued the plaintiff bore comparative liability for not wearing a seatbelt. Conflicting expert testimony was presented regarding the seatbelt's role in the spinal fracture and the potential for fatal injuries with or without its use.
The plaintiff sustained a burst fracture at L1, leading to permanent paraplegia, along with other spinal and internal injuries, requiring extensive hospitalization, surgery, and rehabilitation. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and punitive damages, with experts estimating millions in future care and lost earnings.
After an eight-day trial, a jury found the corporate defendant 34 percent liable, the Sport Trac's driver 30 percent liable, the Silverado's driver 28 percent liable, and the plaintiff 8 percent comparatively liable. The jury awarded $34.22 million in actual damages, reduced to $21.22 million due to comparative liability. Additionally, the jury awarded $33 million in punitive damages against the corporate defendant and $250,000 against its employee, resulting in a total net verdict of $54.47 million for the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.