Texas Judge Awards $81,806 in Jersey Village Car Crash
One driver's vehicle was damaged in a collision with another vehicle at an intersection. The insurance company for the damaged vehicle compensated its insured and then sued the other driver, alleging negligence caused the crash. The defendant claimed they were not responsible. The court ruled in favor of the insurance company, awarding the full amount of damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $81,806
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On June 9, 2019, a vehicle insured by Government Employees Insurance Company, Inc. (GEICO) collided with another vehicle at US-290 and West Road in Jersey Village, Texas. GEICO compensated its insured for the loss, totaling $81,806.58, which included property damage and medical expenses for three individuals. GEICO filed a subrogation lawsuit against the other vehicle's operator on February 2, 2020, alleging negligence caused the incident.
The defendant denied responsibility, claiming the plaintiff's insured's vehicle T-boned his. The case went to mandatory mediation and a bench trial. On October 4, 2021, the court ruled in favor of GEICO, entering a Final Judgment the next day. The court awarded GEICO the full $81,806.58 claimed, plus prejudgment interest, court costs, and post-judgment interest at 5.00% per year. This outcome represented a complete recovery for the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
On May 5, 2016, a collision occurred in Plano, Texas, between a pickup truck and a sedan. The plaintiff, driving a pickup, was in the outside lane of a two-way street when the defendant, operating a sedan, attempted a left turn into a parking lot. The sedan's right front corner struck the pickup's left front. The plaintiff claimed neck and back injuries and subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligent operation of the vehicle. Evidence included a police report citing the defendant for failure to yield the right of way. The defendant did not attend the trial, and the defense did not contest liability. The plaintiff sought $6,295.70 for past medical expenses, alleging sprains and strains that required emergency room care and several months of chiropractic treatment. The defense argued any injuries were minor, subjective sprains and strains, with treatment primarily from a chiropractor, suggesting a jury award of $1,700 for past medical bills. After a two-hour trial, a Plano jury deliberated for 30 minutes before finding the defendant liable for the collision. The jury determined the plaintiff's total damages amounted to $12,591.40.
On May 22, 2017, a collision occurred at an intersection in Fresno, California. A retiree, driving in a left-turn-only lane, began to turn left when a pickup truck, operated by the defendant, struck the passenger side of her vehicle. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the pickup truck, alleging negligence in the operation of his vehicle. A separate claim against the plaintiff's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits was later non-suited. The plaintiff contended that she had a green left-turn arrow, noting that a vehicle in an adjacent left-turn lane also proceeded. She further claimed the defendant was using a cellular phone at the time of the incident, citing records showing phone use near the accident time. The defendant, however, testified he had a green light and had completed his phone call before the collision. Defense counsel argued the plaintiff likely had a flashing yellow arrow. A city employee testified that the intersection's signal sequence would have displayed a flashing yellow arrow for a left turn before a green arrow at the time of the accident. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured shoulder, fractured ribs, a fractured sternum, a foot fracture, a spinal disc herniation, and headaches, and sought damages for past medical expenses, pain, impairment, and disfigurement. The defense focused primarily on liability but also challenged the extent of the plaintiff's injuries by presenting prior medical records showing similar pre-existing conditions and impeaching the plaintiff's testimony regarding her medical history. Following a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for 30 hours before rendering a defense verdict. The jury found the plaintiff to be the sole negligent party in the collision, resulting in a $0 award.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.