Texarkana Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $45,000
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back, elbow, neck, and shoulder. The case proceeded to trial, and the jury found the at-fault driver liable.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $45,000
- County
- Bowie County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In January 2017, a certified nursing assistant was driving in Texarkana when her sport utility vehicle was rear-ended by a pickup truck while she was stopped at a red traffic signal. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained injuries to her back, neck, elbow, and shoulder. She subsequently sued the driver of the pickup truck, alleging negligence in the operation of his vehicle. The defense did not extensively contest liability for the collision.
The plaintiff claimed that while she did not report an injury at the scene, she sought hospital treatment the following day and was diagnosed with sprains to her back, elbow, and neck. She ultimately asserted a partial tear of her right elbow's extensor tendon, alongside sprains and strains to her back and neck, and tendinopathy in her right shoulder. She underwent physical therapy for her neck and two surgeries for her right elbow, testifying that her back, neck, and shoulder injuries resolved, but her elbow remained impaired, preventing her from working as a certified nursing assistant. The plaintiff sought significant damages for past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering, with her attorney requesting a total award of approximately $750,000.
The defense denied that the accident caused the plaintiff's elbow injury. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that the plaintiff had lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow. The defense also highlighted an operative report describing the extensor tendon as frayed and noted a gap in the plaintiff's treatment records, suggesting the elbow injury may have occurred during initial physical therapy. Additionally, the defense pointed out inconsistencies between the plaintiff's testimony and medical records regarding cervical MRIs, muscle strength, and prescription medication use. The defense suggested a significantly lower award for medical expenses and rejected other damage claims, proposing a total of zero to $20,000 for non-economic damages.
After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant liable for the accident. The jury determined the plaintiff's total damages to be $45,000. The award included $23,114 for past medical costs and $21,886 for past physical pain and mental anguish.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bowie County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
On April 26, 2013, a three-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Texas State Highway 75 in Plano. A Chevrolet Cobalt rear-ended a Nissan Maxima, causing the Maxima to then strike a Nissan Altima in front of it. The insurer of the Altima initially sued the drivers of the Maxima and the Cobalt for property damage, but these claims were resolved before trial. The driver of the Maxima, acting as the cross-plaintiff, then pursued claims against the driver of the Cobalt, who was the defendant, for personal injuries and property damage. The cross-plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control speed and maintain a safe distance. Following the incident, the cross-plaintiff reported neck and lower back pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment for two months. Medical imaging allegedly revealed disc bulges and protrusions, and a cervical strain/sprain. The cross-plaintiff sought approximately $12,000 for medical costs, along with damages for past pain, physical impairment, and property damage, claiming inability to continue weightlifting or assist his son in football. The defendant's counsel, whose client did not appear at trial, countered that the cross-plaintiff had initially rear-ended the Altima and then slowed, leading to the second impact. The defense also argued any injuries would have resolved post-treatment. After a one-day trial in Plano, a jury found the defendant negligent and that this negligence was a factual cause of injury to the cross-plaintiff. The jury awarded the cross-plaintiff $22,500. This included $7,500 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, $3,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for property damage.