Tarrant County Jury Awards $1,000 in Red-Light Collision
One driver ran a red light and struck another driver's vehicle. The insurance carrier accepted liability and offered a settlement. The injured driver sued, claiming the vehicle's valuation was too low and seeking additional fees. The defense argued against storage and rental fees, suggesting a lower valuation for the vehicle. The jury awarded the injured driver $1,000.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,000
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On December 12, 2013, an accident occurred in Tarrant County, Texas, when a defendant driving a vehicle ran a red light and struck the plaintiff's 1994 Ford Mustang GT. The collision caused moderate damage to the plaintiff's car, which the defendant's insurance carrier subsequently declared a total loss. The carrier initially offered the plaintiff either $559.71 to keep the vehicle or $1,294.94 if the carrier retained it.
The plaintiff, a body shop owner, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for running the red light and failing to yield the right of way. The defendant stipulated to negligence, having admitted to the investigating officer that she ran the light, a fact corroborated by two eyewitnesses. The plaintiff, representing himself at trial, contended that the insurance carrier's valuation of his vehicle was too low. He sought $4,252 for the actual cash value of the Mustang, presenting NADAguides, Kelley Blue Book printouts, and Craigslist postings to support his valuation, which he argued was conservative given a recently installed new engine. The plaintiff also sought additional damages including property taxes, vehicle registration, towing, storage fees, rental car fees, and administrative and court costs, totaling $7,555.25.
The defense countered that the plaintiff provided no documentation for a new engine and argued that the engine, if new and undamaged, could be removed and sold for $2,750, with the remaining vehicle sold for scrap at $1,000. The defense suggested that if the jury accepted the plaintiff's $4,252 valuation, they should subtract these amounts, resulting in an award of approximately $500. The defense further argued that the plaintiff did not incur actual storage fees, as the car was stored at his own body shop, and did not incur rental fees, as he was able to drive the car from the scene. The defense characterized the Mustang as a "hobby car" rather than primary transportation and argued that rental reimbursement was not appropriate for a vehicle declared a total loss. Defense counsel requested the jury award only $375 for towing.
Following a one-day trial, the jury deliberated and returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $1,000.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
A minor sustained back, head, and neck injuries in a motor vehicle accident in Texas. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, alleging the incident caused the injuries and seeking damages. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from a neurologist specializing in pain management, a neuropsychologist, and an economist. The defense called an expert in aerospace and occupational medicine. The case concluded with an award of $27,255.
On August 4, 2017, a collision occurred in Allen, Texas, at the intersection of West Exchange Parkway and Twin Creeks Drive. The plaintiff, an office assistant, was driving westbound when the defendant, driving eastbound, attempted a left turn. The vehicles collided, and an investigating officer determined the defendant failed to yield the right of way. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging negligent vehicle operation, with the defendant admitting liability. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and left knee sprains and strains, requiring medical treatment and physical therapy. While acknowledging prior neck surgery and a 2016 neck injury, the plaintiff's counsel argued medical records showed no prior knee complaints and limited significant neck issues before the 2017 accident, noting increased pain and impairment afterward. The plaintiff sought over $19,000 for past medical expenses and substantial total damages. The defense highlighted the plaintiff's prior neck issues and a delay in reporting knee pain. The defense contended that ongoing problems stemmed from pre-existing conditions, age, or normal wear and tear. A jury awarded the plaintiff $83,631 in damages.