Sugar Land Jury Awards $270,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped her vehicle in traffic and was rear-ended by another car. The impact pushed her vehicle into the car in front of her. The injured driver sustained a foot injury and a torn tendon, requiring surgery and physical therapy. She later experienced a fall and subsequent injuries to her wrist and knee, which she attributed to her initial foot injury.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $270,000
- County
- Fort Bend County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Leg / Foot Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A homemaker sustained injuries in a multi-vehicle rear-end collision on November 17, 2009, in Sugar Land, Texas. After her vehicle stopped in traffic, it was rear-ended by a Toyota 4Runner. The Toyota was then struck by another SUV, pushing the plaintiff's vehicle into the one ahead. The plaintiff alleged the driver of the Toyota that rear-ended her switched places with a passenger after the collision. The plaintiff suffered a right foot fracture and a torn right peroneal tendon.
The plaintiff initially sued the drivers of the Toyota, who settled for their $25,000 policy limit. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against her own underinsured motorist insurer, Allstate Indemnity Co., seeking benefits. She claimed the initial rear-ending driver was negligent by failing to keep a proper lookout, driving too fast, failing to control speed, following too closely, and failing to brake or turn. The insurer initially contended that the driver of the third vehicle was at fault, an opinion stated in the police report, but that officer's opinion was excluded from evidence at trial.
During the trial, the insurer conceded that the initial rear-ending driver was negligent. The plaintiff presented evidence of her injuries, including surgical repair of her tendon, ongoing "drop foot," and mild gait impairment, which she attributed to a subsequent fall in 2015. Her treating podiatrist testified about the need for potential future surgeries due to persistent pain. The defense disputed the connection between the original injury and the 2015 fall, questioned the extent of ongoing pain, and challenged the surgeon's qualifications regarding future care.
A Sugar Land jury deliberated for four hours before finding the initial rear-ending driver negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $270,000 in damages for past and future medical costs, physical impairment, and pain and anguish. After applying a $25,000 credit from the initial liability settlement and $2,500 in personal injury protection payments, the net award totaled $242,500. However, due to the plaintiff's underinsured motorist policy limit of $100,000, that was the maximum recoverable amount in this lawsuit. According to plaintiff's counsel, the plaintiff planned to file a separate action against Allstate Indemnity Co. for alleged bad faith and violations of the Texas Insurance Code.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Fort Bend County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.