San Patricio County Jury Awards $2.4M for Fatal Trucking Negligence
A driver was killed when his vehicle struck a steel plate extending from the back of an 18-wheeler. The truck was stopped in a crossover lane at night, and the load was partially blocking the driver's lane. The driver's family sued the trucking company, the transportation broker, and others, alleging negligence in how the load was transported and secured. Some defendants settled before trial, and the jury found others negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $2,400,000
- County
- San Patricio County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On January 8, 2014, a 50-year-old refinery worker died in San Patricio County when his vehicle struck an oversize steel plate extending from an 18-wheeler. The tractor-trailer was stopped in a crossover lane on an unlit Highway 361 at night. The plate, an oversize load, extended nine feet off the back of the truck, partially blocking the worker's lane. The truck driver had not obtained a required permit, which would have prohibited night transport of the load.
The decedent's widow and three adult children filed a negligence lawsuit against the truck driver, his employer (a trucking company), a transportation broker who arranged the shipment, and a warehousing company that loaded the plate. The plate owner settled for a confidential amount before trial, and the warehousing company settled during trial. The plaintiffs alleged the driver was negligent for transporting the load without a permit and at night, and that the trucking company and broker were negligent in hiring, training, supervising, retaining, and entrusting the driver, citing the driver's poor driving history. They also claimed the broker had a duty to ensure the permit was obtained and exercised sufficient control to be vicariously liable.
The trucking company and driver largely did not dispute liability but argued the warehousing company and broker were also negligent. The driver admitted he avoided obtaining a permit to save money. The broker denied negligence, contending that the trucking company, as an independent contractor, was solely responsible for hiring and training safe drivers and obtaining permits. The broker argued it vetted carriers but had no duty or means to check individual drivers' records.
After an eight-day trial, the jury found the trucking company and driver each 40 percent negligent, and the warehousing company 20 percent negligent. The jury did not find the transportation broker negligent. The plaintiffs were awarded $2.4 million in total damages, including punitive damages against the trucking company and driver. Due to the warehousing company's prior settlement, the plaintiffs recovered the portion of the verdict owed by the trucking company and driver.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in San Patricio County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.