Reno, Nevada Jury Awards $10,780 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling west on a road when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The case involved conflicting accounts of how the accident occurred, including claims about speed, lane changes, and braking. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering. The defense argued that the injuries were less severe than claimed and questioned the injured driver's credibility.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $14,374
- County
- Lamar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 1, 2017, a rear-end collision occurred in Reno, Nevada. The plaintiff, a cleaning worker, was driving a compact car when the defendant, operating a sport utility vehicle, struck her vehicle from behind on Lamar Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent in operating her vehicle, claiming to have sustained primarily neck and back injuries.
The plaintiff testified she was in the left lane when the incident happened. A police report, admitted into evidence, cited the defendant for failing to control speed. A witness corroborated the plaintiff’s account, stating the defendant approached at high speed and rear-ended the plaintiff without braking. The defendant, however, contended the plaintiff changed lanes and braked suddenly, causing the collision. Defense counsel questioned the plaintiff's credibility, noting her testimony about using cruise control below the speed limit in the left lane and her admission of being late for work, along with perceived inconsistencies between her and the witness's statements at the scene.
The plaintiff sought damages for lumbar disc disorder, cervical facet syndrome, sprains, and pain, reporting ongoing chronic pain and initial job loss attributed to the injuries. She requested approximately $12,224 for past medical expenses, $6,480 for lost earning capacity, and $50,000 for past and future non-economic damages. A defense chiropractor opined the plaintiff sustained only sprains and that only a portion of her treatment was medically necessary, also noting the absence of imaging due to her pregnancy and a chiropractor's discharge summary suggesting pregnancy as a factor for ongoing pain. The defense also disputed the plaintiff's claim of job loss due to the accident, presenting employment records indicating an earlier termination.
After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for one hour. The jury found both parties negligent, assigning 75 percent responsibility to the defendant and 25 percent to the plaintiff. The jury awarded $14,374 in damages, which was then reduced to $10,780.50 due to the plaintiff's comparative negligence. The awarded amount for past medical expenses ($7,174) was consistent with the defense expert's opinion on reasonable treatment costs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Lamar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
On April 26, 2013, a three-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Texas State Highway 75 in Plano. A Chevrolet Cobalt rear-ended a Nissan Maxima, causing the Maxima to then strike a Nissan Altima in front of it. The insurer of the Altima initially sued the drivers of the Maxima and the Cobalt for property damage, but these claims were resolved before trial. The driver of the Maxima, acting as the cross-plaintiff, then pursued claims against the driver of the Cobalt, who was the defendant, for personal injuries and property damage. The cross-plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control speed and maintain a safe distance. Following the incident, the cross-plaintiff reported neck and lower back pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment for two months. Medical imaging allegedly revealed disc bulges and protrusions, and a cervical strain/sprain. The cross-plaintiff sought approximately $12,000 for medical costs, along with damages for past pain, physical impairment, and property damage, claiming inability to continue weightlifting or assist his son in football. The defendant's counsel, whose client did not appear at trial, countered that the cross-plaintiff had initially rear-ended the Altima and then slowed, leading to the second impact. The defense also argued any injuries would have resolved post-treatment. After a one-day trial in Plano, a jury found the defendant negligent and that this negligence was a factual cause of injury to the cross-plaintiff. The jury awarded the cross-plaintiff $22,500. This included $7,500 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, $3,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for property damage.