Parker County Jury Awards $6,250 in Rear-End Collision
A 21-year-old driver was stopped at a red light when her car was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed injuries to her head, neck, and back. She sought damages for pain, suffering, and future medical care. The defense argued that the injuries were exaggerated and potentially related to prior conditions.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,250
- County
- Parker County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In July 2013, a collision occurred in Parker County when the plaintiff's vehicle, stopped at a red traffic signal, was rear-ended by a minivan operated by the defendant. The plaintiff, a hairdresser, subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent in operating the vehicle and seeking damages for injuries to her back, head, and neck. The defendant later died from unrelated causes during the litigation, and her estate was substituted as the defendant. The court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability, proceeding to a trial solely on damages.
The plaintiff claimed extensive injuries, including a traumatic brain injury (coup-contrecoup and diffuse axonal injury) manifesting as seizures, migraines, memory impairment, and balance issues. She also alleged a cervical disc bulge with radiating pain, and sprains and strains of the lumbar region. Medical records indicated ongoing chiropractic and neurological treatment, emergency room visits, and expert opinions supporting brain damage and significant future care needs. Plaintiff's economic experts estimated lost earnings and future care costs ranging from over $1.3 million to nearly $4 million.
The defense contested the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, noting minimal damage to the vehicles and no immediate injury reports at the scene. Defense experts argued that the plaintiff did not report brain injury symptoms until nearly two years after the accident, that the diagnostic scans used were not reliable for detecting brain damage, and that there was no objective evidence of such an injury. The defense further suggested the plaintiff suffered from a conversion or somatoform disorder, attributing her symptoms to psychological factors and pre-existing conditions like depression and anxiety. They pointed to the plaintiff's extensive doctor visits and inconsistent medical findings, proposing only a small award for past damages.
Following a one-week trial, the jury deliberated for 1.5 hours and returned a unanimous verdict, awarding the plaintiff $6,250. The award specifically addressed past physical pain and suffering, indicating the jury largely rejected the plaintiff's claims for extensive and long-term damages, including the significant brain injury and associated future economic losses.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Parker County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On July 16, 2015, in Plano, Texas, a plaintiff's vehicle was rear-ended by another car while stopped at a traffic signal. The plaintiff, an office worker, sued the driver for negligence, claiming neck and back injuries. Initial allegations against the vehicle owners were dismissed, and the driver conceded liability, leading the trial to focus exclusively on damages. The plaintiff reported a C4-5 disc protrusion with nerve impingement and cervicogenic migraines, which she attributed to the collision or an aggravation of pre-existing conditions. Her medical treatments included various therapies and injections, and a neurosurgeon recommended potential future surgery. She also claimed significant impacts on her career and social life. The defense argued the plaintiff's neck problems were pre-existing and age-related, disputing the accident's severity and questioning the necessity of all medical costs. After a two-day trial, a jury deliberated for 1.5 hours before awarding the plaintiff $88,400. This award covered past and future medical costs, physical impairment, physical pain and suffering, and mental anguish.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.