La Salle County Jury Awards $9,293,400 in Tractor-Trailer Collision
One truck driver was operating a tractor-trailer when another truck driver pulled out from a stop sign and turned left, colliding with the first truck. The first truck driver alleged negligence and gross negligence, claiming the other driver failed to stop at the stop sign. The defense argued the first truck driver was speeding and partly responsible. The injured driver sustained multiple fractures, ligament tears, and disc injuries, claiming permanent disability and seeking over $50 million.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,326,000
- County
- LaSalle County, TX
- Resolved
- 2023
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Hip Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In October 2018, a collision occurred in La Salle County when a tractor-trailer operated by a defendant driver pulled out from a stop sign, attempting a left turn, and was struck by a plaintiff truck driver operating another tractor-trailer. The plaintiff, who did not have a stop sign, sustained severe injuries. The defendant driver was operating an empty hazardous-materials tanker in the course of his employment for a defendant employer. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and gross negligence against both the defendant driver and the defendant employer. A staffing company that had hired the defendant driver for the employer was initially named as a defendant but was later dismissed from the case.
The plaintiff's legal counsel argued that the defendant driver failed to stop at the stop sign, a claim supported by data from the defendant's tractor. It was also alleged that the defendant driver's hazmat endorsement had expired before his employment and that the defendant employer's director was aware of this. Furthermore, the plaintiff contended that the defendant driver had a history of speeding tickets and license suspensions and was untruthful in discovery. The collision resulted in extensive injuries for the plaintiff, including multiple fractures, internal ligament tears, a brain injury, and psychological conditions, requiring numerous surgeries and leading to claims of permanent disability. The plaintiff sought over $50 million in damages, including past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, pain, impairment, and punitive damages.
The defense denied that the employer's director knew the hazmat endorsement had expired, arguing that the license report was unclear. The defense also contended that the plaintiff was speeding, based on skid marks at the scene, and was therefore partly responsible for the crash. While not disputing the orthopedic injuries, the defense argued that the plaintiff's concussion had resolved without lasting effects and suggested an award of $6 million to $7 million.
After a 10-day trial and three hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict. It found the defendant driver 60 percent negligent, the defendant employer 30 percent negligent, and the plaintiff 10 percent comparatively negligent. The jury also found both the defendant driver and the defendant employer grossly negligent. The total award to the plaintiff was $10,326,000, which was reduced by the plaintiff's comparative negligence to a net amount of $9,293,400.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in LaSalle County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.
A minor sustained back, head, and neck injuries in a motor vehicle accident in Texas. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, alleging the incident caused the injuries and seeking damages. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from a neurologist specializing in pain management, a neuropsychologist, and an economist. The defense called an expert in aerospace and occupational medicine. The case concluded with an award of $27,255.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.