Irving, Texas Jury Awards $24 Million in Fatal Dram Shop Crash
A driver lost control of a vehicle while speeding and under the influence of alcohol, causing it to roll over and catch fire. The passenger sustained fatal injuries. The passenger's estate sued the nightclub where the driver had been served alcohol, alleging negligence in serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. The defense argued the driver was not obviously intoxicated at the club and that the passenger was also negligent for not wearing a seatbelt.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $25,000,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Highway
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In December 2012, a football player, who was a recent addition to a professional team's practice squad, sustained fatal injuries in a high-speed car accident in Irving, Texas. The incident occurred shortly after midnight when the player left Beamers Private Club, a Dallas nightclub, as a passenger in a sedan driven by his roommate, who was also a professional football player. Minutes later, the driver-defendant lost control of the vehicle on State Highway 114, causing it to roll over and catch fire. A blood test revealed the driver-defendant's blood alcohol concentration was 0.189, more than twice the legal limit. He was later sentenced to six months in jail and 10 years' probation for driving while intoxicated.
The decedent's mother, acting individually and as administrator of his estate, filed a lawsuit against the club and its manager, alleging negligent service of alcohol to the driver-defendant. The suit also named the driver-defendant, claiming he was negligent in operating his vehicle. Other entities initially named in the lawsuit were later dismissed, and the decedent's father's consolidated claims were nonsuited. The club and its manager had filed for bankruptcy after the lawsuit began, and they were uninsured.
During the trial, the plaintiffs' counsel argued that the club-defendants' staff failed to follow written policies regarding alcohol service and allowed the driver-defendant to serve himself bottles of alcohol, leading to overconsumption. Cell phone videos allegedly showed the driver-defendant drinking from a bottle, and a toxicology expert opined that he would have needed 17 drinks to reach his blood alcohol concentration. The plaintiffs' counsel suggested the jury assign 85 percent responsibility to the club-defendants and 15 percent to the driver-defendant. In response, the club-defendants denied the driver-defendant was visibly intoxicated and contended that most of his alcohol consumption occurred before arriving at the club. They argued that if the driver-defendant was visibly intoxicated, the decedent was negligent for entering the vehicle with him and for not wearing a seat belt. The club-defendants' counsel suggested a different apportionment of fault, placing 95 percent responsibility on the driver-defendant and 5 percent on the decedent. The driver-defendant testified he did not drink before the club and disputed drinking from a bottle at the club.
After a six-day trial and five hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, finding comparative negligence. The jury assigned 48 percent responsibility to the club and its manager, 48 percent to the driver-defendant, and 4 percent to the decedent. The jury did not find gross negligence. Total damages were awarded at $25,000,000, which was reduced to $24,000,000 due to the decedent's comparative responsibility.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.