Houston Motor Vehicle Negligence Award of $230,843 Upheld
One driver sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving another driver. The injured driver filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and seeking compensation for medical expenses. The defense denied allegations and asserted defenses including contributory negligence and pre-existing conditions. After several years and attorney changes, the case went to trial. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages for past and future medical expenses. The court entered a judgment including damages, costs, and interest. The defendant appealed, but the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $230,843
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2024
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A motor vehicle accident occurred on March 6, 2017, resulting in injuries to the plaintiff. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit against the defendant in a Houston, Texas court, alleging negligence and seeking compensation for medical expenses incurred as a result of the incident.
The plaintiff presented evidence of sustained injuries and designated an expert witness, a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician, to testify about the diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and the necessity and reasonableness of related medical charges. The defendant denied the allegations and asserted defenses including contributory negligence, claiming the plaintiff suddenly applied brakes and failed to mitigate damages. The defense further contended that some medical treatment was not reasonable or necessary, that MRI findings indicated degenerative changes rather than acute injuries, and that the medical charges were excessive. The defendant also presented a counter-affidavit from an orthopedic surgeon challenging the necessity and cost of the plaintiff's medical care.
After a multi-year litigation process, the case proceeded to trial. On September 28, 2022, a jury unanimously found the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff's injuries and awarded $209,669 in damages, comprising $36,539 for past medical expenses and $173,130 for future medical expenses. The court entered a corrected final judgment on February 10, 2023, totaling $230,843.61, which included damages, court costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. The defendant appealed to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, challenging the sufficiency of evidence for the medical expense award. On March 5, 2024, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in its entirety.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
On September 2, 2016, a collision occurred in a Plano parking lot. A plaintiff, a hotel hostess and gift-shop attendant, was driving in an aisle next to a street when a defendant, driving on the street, made a right turn into the parking lot driveway. The vehicles collided. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and knee injuries and subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The plaintiff testified that she was making a left turn at the driveway when the defendant turned into it, claiming the driveway was wide enough for two vehicles but the defendant made too wide a turn. The defendant denied making a wide turn, asserting her turn was completed when the plaintiff's vehicle scraped across her front end. Photos of vehicle damage, showing front-distributed damage to the defendant's car and left front corner to driver's door damage to the plaintiff's, were presented as evidence, which defense counsel argued supported the defendant's account. The plaintiff underwent various treatments, including emergency room care, physical therapy, pain management, and MRIs revealing a meniscus tear, disc protrusions, stenosis, and a disc bulge. She sought damages for past and future medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Defense counsel argued the impact was not major, highlighted delays and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment, and impeached the plaintiff with evidence of a prior accident and chiropractic care despite her testimony denying previous injuries. Following a one-day trial, a jury rendered a defense verdict. The jury found that neither party's negligence, if any, proximately caused the accident. Consequently, the damages question was not addressed.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
A minor sustained back, head, and neck injuries in a motor vehicle accident in Texas. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, alleging the incident caused the injuries and seeking damages. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from a neurologist specializing in pain management, a neuropsychologist, and an economist. The defense called an expert in aerospace and occupational medicine. The case concluded with an award of $27,255.