Houston Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision
Two people were injured in a motor vehicle collision in Houston, Texas. Their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. A commercial truck was also involved in the incident. The injured parties filed a lawsuit against the drivers and the trucking company, alleging negligence. The defendants denied liability and asserted various defenses. The jury found in favor of the defendants, determining they were not liable for the collision.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $24,310
- County
- Fort Bend County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 2, 2015, two individuals were injured in a multi-vehicle collision in Houston, Texas. A plaintiff was driving a Mazda with a passenger, another plaintiff, when their vehicle was rear-ended by a Chevrolet Malibu operated by a defendant. A Volvo, operated by another defendant acting within the scope of employment for a defendant company, was also involved in the incident.
On February 24, 2017, the injured plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Malibu driver, the Volvo driver, and the Volvo's corporate owner. The plaintiffs alleged the defendants' negligence caused the collision and that the corporate defendant had negligently entrusted its vehicle. They sought damages for past and future medical expenses, lost income, physical impairment, pain and suffering, property damage, and punitive damages. The defendants responded with a general denial and asserted defenses including the plaintiffs' own negligence, failure to mitigate damages, pre-existing conditions, and that the incident was an unavoidable accident or sudden emergency. They also challenged the constitutionality of exemplary damages. During pre-trial proceedings on December 6, 2018, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion to exclude the testimony of a defense expert.
The case proceeded to trial, and on August 30, 2019, the jury returned a verdict finding the defendants were not negligent in the automobile accident. No damages were awarded to the plaintiffs, resulting in a defendant win on the merits of the collision. Following the verdict, on September 16, 2020, the court awarded attorneys' fees and costs totaling $19,685.36 to one defendant, to be paid by the plaintiffs. Separately, the court also awarded $4,624.95 in attorneys' fees and costs to the plaintiffs, to be paid by the corporate defendant and another individual defendant. The litigation ultimately concluded with the jury's finding of no liability for the defendants.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Fort Bend County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their neck and lower back. The other driver argued they were not negligent and that the impact was minor. The jury found the driver who caused the collision not liable.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck and back strains, sprains, and shoulder pain. She also claimed anxiety for her unborn child. The defense argued that the defendant's actions did not cause the injuries and questioned the extent of the claimed damages.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
On October 30, 2014, a plaintiff was involved in a rear-end collision in Plano, Texas. The plaintiff's sport utility vehicle was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by the defendant while stopped at an intersection on East Plano Parkway near Los Rios Boulevard. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent in operating the vehicle. The plaintiff claimed to have stopped normally at a yellow traffic signal. Injuries alleged included a concussion and post-concussion syndrome, with symptoms such as headaches, vertigo, and memory impairment, in addition to sprains and strains to the cervical and lumbar regions. The plaintiff sought approximately $47,000 for past medical expenses, along with damages for past physical impairment, pain, and mental anguish. The defendant contended being distracted by another vehicle that appeared poised to enter the intersection against a red light. The defendant also claimed the plaintiff seemed to proceed into the intersection before an abrupt stop. Defense counsel questioned the causation of the head injury, noting a delayed complaint, and cited the plaintiff's prior neck issues, a previous head injury, and past memory problems. Plaintiff's counsel countered that any prior issues had resolved years before the accident. Following a three-day trial, the jury rendered a defense verdict, finding the defendant was not negligent regarding the accident. Although the jury did find $15,000 in damages—comprising $8,000 for past medical expenses, $5,000 for past physical pain and mental anguish, and $2,000 for past physical impairment—the plaintiff received no award due to the finding of no negligence.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.