Houston Jury Awards $90,000 in Negligence Rear-End Collision
A driver was waiting to merge onto a highway when another driver rear-ended their trailer. The police report cited the second driver for failure to control speed. The injured driver sought treatment for lower back pain, including chiropractic care, injections, and recommended surgery. The defense argued that some of the treatment was unrelated to the accident and that the surgery was not necessary.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $90,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In October 2010, a landscaping crew foreman was driving a pickup truck with a flatbed trailer on an entrance ramp of Highway 290 in Houston when a driver rear-ended the trailer. A police report attributed fault to the defendant for failing to control speed. The foreman sustained lower back injuries, including an annular tear and a herniated disc, and sought emergency medical care by ambulance, followed by chiropractic treatment and physical therapy.
The foreman sued the driver for negligent failure to control speed or keep a proper lookout. The defendant stipulated to liability, narrowing the trial's focus to damages. The plaintiff claimed his pain initially resolved, but returned approximately two and a half years later, leading to further evaluation and treatment. This included referrals to an orthopedic surgeon and a neurosurgeon, who recommended a spinal fusion surgery but advised the plaintiff to lose weight first. The plaintiff's neurosurgeon testified that the injuries were caused by the accident, that treatment was reasonable and necessary, and estimated future surgery costs at $150,000. The plaintiff sought $18,200 for past medical bills, $150,000 for future medical bills, and $36,500 for past pain and suffering.
The defense emphasized significant gaps in the plaintiff's medical treatment, arguing that later treatments were unrelated to the collision. A defense orthopedic surgeon testified that future surgery was unnecessary, but if needed, would cost substantially less. This expert also stated that minor vehicle damage suggested the trailer absorbed most of the impact, implying the accident did not cause the claimed injuries. The defense proposed an award of $8,400 for past medical bills covering only the initial treatment, and $2,000 for past pain and suffering.
Following a one-day trial and one hour of deliberation, a jury in Houston awarded the plaintiff $90,000. The award covered past and future medical bills and past pain and suffering. The jury did not award damages for physical impairment or future pain and suffering.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.
On February 20, 2015, a collision occurred on President George Bush Turnpike in Collin County involving a 2008 Chevrolet HHR driven by the plaintiff and a 2013 GMC Sierra driven by the defendant. The plaintiff alleged the defendant unsafely changed lanes, striking the plaintiff's vehicle, which then hit a concrete barrier. The plaintiff further claimed the defendant stopped suddenly on the shoulder, causing the plaintiff to rear-end the defendant. The plaintiff, who sustained neck, back, and knee injuries, subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligence, including failure to maintain a single lane, unsafe lane change, improper lookout, and unsafe stopping. The defendant countered that the plaintiff initiated the collision by moving into the defendant's lane. The defendant stated that the plaintiff then stopped on the shoulder, and the defendant stopped normally about 100 yards ahead, before the plaintiff intentionally rear-ended the defendant. Following the collision, the plaintiff admitted to physically assaulting the defendant, citing anger over the incident and the defendant's alleged sudden stop. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling $22,469, past lost wages, and past and future pain, suffering, and mental anguish. The defense contended the plaintiff's claimed injuries were pre-existing and challenged the plaintiff's credibility, noting inconsistencies in past medical history and that the lost wage claim was supported solely by the plaintiff's testimony. After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for two hours. The jury concluded that only the plaintiff was negligent in the incident and awarded zero damages.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.