Houston Jury Awards $13,782 in Red-Light Collision
One driver was traveling east on a highway in Houston and was broadsided by another driver making a left turn. The first driver claimed neck, back, and dental injuries. The second driver claimed the first driver was negligent for running a red light and failing to yield. The defense argued the first driver was also negligent for not ensuring the intersection was clear. The jury found both drivers negligent but awarded damages to the first driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $14,619
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 27, 2013, a collision occurred at the intersection of Beaumont Highway and Oates Road in Houston. The plaintiff, a residential care assistant, was driving eastbound when her vehicle broadsided the defendant's vehicle, which was northbound and preparing to turn left. The plaintiff sustained neck, back, and dental injuries.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent for running a red light, failing to yield, failing to maintain a proper lookout, and failing to brake or turn to avoid the collision. The plaintiff maintained that her traffic light was green and the defendant's was red. The defendant denied negligence, testifying that she entered the intersection behind a tractor-trailer and, though she could not see the light's color at that moment, it had been green when the truck entered. The defense also argued that the plaintiff was comparatively negligent for failing to ensure the intersection was clear, even if she had a green light.
The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains and strains, and the loss of a lower front tooth due to airbag deployment. She underwent chiropractic care, medical consultations, and an MRI, seeking $10,172 for past medical bills, including dental expenses, and approximately $1,200 for lost wages, along with damages for pain. A defense neurologist opined that the plaintiff's injuries should have resolved within seven to ten days and that much of the subsequent treatment was unnecessary or unrelated to the accident, noting pre-existing periodontal disease.
Following a one-day trial, the jury found both parties negligent, assigning 80 percent responsibility to the defendant and 20 percent to the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $14,619 in damages. After reduction for comparative responsibility, along with prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $13,782.84.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On May 5, 2016, a collision occurred in Plano, Texas, between a pickup truck and a sedan. The plaintiff, driving a pickup, was in the outside lane of a two-way street when the defendant, operating a sedan, attempted a left turn into a parking lot. The sedan's right front corner struck the pickup's left front. The plaintiff claimed neck and back injuries and subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligent operation of the vehicle. Evidence included a police report citing the defendant for failure to yield the right of way. The defendant did not attend the trial, and the defense did not contest liability. The plaintiff sought $6,295.70 for past medical expenses, alleging sprains and strains that required emergency room care and several months of chiropractic treatment. The defense argued any injuries were minor, subjective sprains and strains, with treatment primarily from a chiropractor, suggesting a jury award of $1,700 for past medical bills. After a two-hour trial, a Plano jury deliberated for 30 minutes before finding the defendant liable for the collision. The jury determined the plaintiff's total damages amounted to $12,591.40.
On May 22, 2017, a collision occurred at an intersection in Fresno, California. A retiree, driving in a left-turn-only lane, began to turn left when a pickup truck, operated by the defendant, struck the passenger side of her vehicle. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the pickup truck, alleging negligence in the operation of his vehicle. A separate claim against the plaintiff's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits was later non-suited. The plaintiff contended that she had a green left-turn arrow, noting that a vehicle in an adjacent left-turn lane also proceeded. She further claimed the defendant was using a cellular phone at the time of the incident, citing records showing phone use near the accident time. The defendant, however, testified he had a green light and had completed his phone call before the collision. Defense counsel argued the plaintiff likely had a flashing yellow arrow. A city employee testified that the intersection's signal sequence would have displayed a flashing yellow arrow for a left turn before a green arrow at the time of the accident. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured shoulder, fractured ribs, a fractured sternum, a foot fracture, a spinal disc herniation, and headaches, and sought damages for past medical expenses, pain, impairment, and disfigurement. The defense focused primarily on liability but also challenged the extent of the plaintiff's injuries by presenting prior medical records showing similar pre-existing conditions and impeaching the plaintiff's testimony regarding her medical history. Following a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for 30 hours before rendering a defense verdict. The jury found the plaintiff to be the sole negligent party in the collision, resulting in a $0 award.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.