Hidalgo Jury Awards $810,000 in Fatal Pedestrian Accident
A driver struck and killed a pedestrian in a crosswalk at night. The pedestrian's estate sued the driver and his employer, alleging negligence. The defense argued the pedestrian was also at fault. The jury found the driver negligent but also found the pedestrian partially responsible. The estate was awarded damages for the pedestrian's pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $900,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 27, 2014, a pedestrian was fatally struck by a van while crossing East Coma Avenue in a marked crosswalk in Hidalgo. The westbound van, driven by an employee of a transit service company, collided with the pedestrian, who sustained fatal injuries. The pedestrian's estate, represented by his brother, subsequently sued the driver and the employer, alleging negligence for failing to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and control the vehicle's speed.
The plaintiff argued the driver was solely negligent. Surveillance video confirmed the pedestrian was in the crosswalk, and accident reconstruction experts for both sides agreed the van was speeding at impact, though they differed on the exact velocity. Experts also concluded that if the driver had adhered to the speed limit, the pedestrian would not have been in the intersection at the time of the van's passage. The defense contended the pedestrian was contributorily negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout and cited challenging environmental conditions, including dark streets and glare, as factors preventing the driver from seeing the pedestrian. The plaintiff's counsel highlighted that the driver initially provided no excuse for failing to see the pedestrian, and the defense's environmental theory developed later. Damages sought were limited to the pedestrian's conscious pain and suffering, which a defense medical expert disputed.
Following a five-day trial, a Hidalgo jury found both parties negligent. The jury assigned 90 percent of the fault to the driver and 10 percent to the pedestrian, awarding $900,000 for pain and suffering. After accounting for comparative responsibility, the net award to the estate totaled $810,000. The defense subsequently filed post-trial motions challenging the verdict.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.