Harris County Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision
One driver sued another after a rear-end collision. The first driver alleged the second driver failed to control speed and caused injuries. The second driver denied fault and raised several defenses. A jury found the second driver's actions did not cause the crash, and no damages were awarded to the first driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $3,290
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A rear-end collision occurred on July 9, 2018, in Harris County, Texas, leading to a lawsuit filed by the occupants of the struck vehicle against the driver of the trailing vehicle. The plaintiffs alleged the defendant failed to control his speed while they slowed for traffic on Louetta Road, resulting in the collision. They claimed the defendant received a citation for failure to control speed and that his negligence caused them serious injuries.
The plaintiffs sought damages for past and future medical expenses, physical pain and suffering, physical impairment, mental anguish, loss of earning capacity, and physical disfigurement. The defendant denied all allegations, asserting various statutory defenses regarding damage limitations. The defendant later argued for doctrines of sudden emergency or unavoidable accident, claimed contributory negligence by one plaintiff, challenged the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses, and alleged pre-existing damages and failure to mitigate.
A jury subsequently found that the defendant's negligence did not proximately cause the occurrence in question. As a result, no damages were awarded to the plaintiffs. The court later granted the defendant's motion for judgment, and the defendant recovered court costs totaling $3,290.51 from the plaintiffs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their neck and lower back. The other driver argued they were not negligent and that the impact was minor. The jury found the driver who caused the collision not liable.
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck and back strains, sprains, and shoulder pain. She also claimed anxiety for her unborn child. The defense argued that the defendant's actions did not cause the injuries and questioned the extent of the claimed damages.
One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in an injury. The case was settled for $97,500.
A case involving a motor vehicle accident featured testimony from a plaintiff's expert specializing in vocational economics, rehabilitation counseling, disability assessment, labor economics, and lost wages. Few other details were available regarding the incident, the legal claims, or the case's conclusion.
On October 30, 2014, a plaintiff was involved in a rear-end collision in Plano, Texas. The plaintiff's sport utility vehicle was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by the defendant while stopped at an intersection on East Plano Parkway near Los Rios Boulevard. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent in operating the vehicle. The plaintiff claimed to have stopped normally at a yellow traffic signal. Injuries alleged included a concussion and post-concussion syndrome, with symptoms such as headaches, vertigo, and memory impairment, in addition to sprains and strains to the cervical and lumbar regions. The plaintiff sought approximately $47,000 for past medical expenses, along with damages for past physical impairment, pain, and mental anguish. The defendant contended being distracted by another vehicle that appeared poised to enter the intersection against a red light. The defendant also claimed the plaintiff seemed to proceed into the intersection before an abrupt stop. Defense counsel questioned the causation of the head injury, noting a delayed complaint, and cited the plaintiff's prior neck issues, a previous head injury, and past memory problems. Plaintiff's counsel countered that any prior issues had resolved years before the accident. Following a three-day trial, the jury rendered a defense verdict, finding the defendant was not negligent regarding the accident. Although the jury did find $15,000 in damages—comprising $8,000 for past medical expenses, $5,000 for past physical pain and mental anguish, and $2,000 for past physical impairment—the plaintiff received no award due to the finding of no negligence.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.