Harris County Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $6,925 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped at a red light was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who caused the collision was reportedly under the influence of medication. The collision resulted in injuries to the neck, low back, hip, and knee. The case involved claims of negligence and gross negligence. The jury found the at-fault driver negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,925
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On October 12, 2016, a driver, later identified as the plaintiff, was rear-ended while stopped at a red light in Harris County, Texas. The driver of the striking vehicle, later identified as the defendant's decedent, was reportedly under the influence of medication after a recent hospital discharge. An investigating officer drove the decedent home from the scene. The plaintiff sustained injuries to the neck, lower back, right hip, and right knee, requiring medical treatment, including chiropractic care. MRI scans revealed cervical spine abnormalities, lumbar disc protrusion, and right knee injuries.
The defendant's decedent died weeks after the incident. The plaintiff later filed a lawsuit against the decedent's estate, alleging negligence and gross negligence. The plaintiff claimed the decedent failed to provide warning, pay proper attention, control speed, and drove when incompetent or distracted.
The defendant estate filed a general denial and argued the collision was minor. The defense further contended the police report indicated no impairment, the plaintiff reported no immediate injuries at the scene, and she delayed seeking medical treatment for sixteen days. The defendant also asserted that the plaintiff had a prior accident with similar injuries and that there was no evidence of gross negligence to support punitive damages. The case proceeded to a jury trial after the court denied the defendant's no-evidence motion for summary judgment on the gross negligence claim and granted the plaintiff's motion to strike defense medical expert counter-affidavits.
On August 14, 2019, the jury found the defendant's decedent negligent. The court entered a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $5,618.34 for past medical care expenses, $499.78 in pre-judgment interest, and $807.81 in taxable court costs. The total recovery amounted to $6,925, subject to post-judgment interest.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.