Fort Worth Judge Awards $42,270 After Pedestrian Truck Collision
A person was walking across a road when a pickup truck's mirror struck them, knocking them down. One of the truck's tires then ran over their foot. The injured person sustained multiple injuries. The case involved claims of negligence and arguments about fault, including the injured person's potential responsibility and a history of mental health issues.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $84,541
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Strains and Sprains, Soft Tissue, Back and Neck
Case Overview
On January 13, 2014, in Fort Worth, Texas, a pedestrian was struck by a pickup truck on the eastbound feeder road of Loop 820, west of Quebec Street. The driver, an employee of a drilling company, was operating the vehicle within the scope of his employment when the truck's mirror struck the pedestrian, knocking him down, and a tire ran over his left foot. The pedestrian sustained multiple injuries, including a closed head injury, a left ulna fracture, and a fractured great toe. He subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver and the drilling company, alleging negligence for failing to keep a proper lookout and to avoid the collision.
The plaintiff acknowledged partial responsibility for the incident. The defense denied negligence, arguing the pedestrian was solely at fault. Evidence presented included the pedestrian testing positive for marijuana after the incident, being outside a crosswalk, and medical records suggesting an intent to commit suicide by walking into traffic. The defense also cited a history of mental illness and alleged suicide attempts. The plaintiff denied suicidal intent, stating he only expressed wishing the incident had been fatal due to severe injuries.
Following a one-day bench trial, the judge found both the driver and the pedestrian equally negligent, assigning 50 percent comparative responsibility to each. The court awarded the pedestrian $84,541.01 in damages for past medical costs, past and future pain and mental anguish, and past physical impairment. After the reduction for comparative responsibility, the pedestrian's net recovery totaled $42,270.51.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 12, 2012, a collision occurred in McKinney, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a convenience store clerk, and a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was traveling northbound on Custer Road when the defendant, who was at a stop sign on Cotton Ridge Road, attempted a right turn. The plaintiff's vehicle struck the defendant's vehicle in the middle northbound lane of Custer Road. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently entered the lane, failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, and make a safe turn. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries from the incident. An eyewitness testified that the defendant's vehicle entered the plaintiff's lane, and both the eyewitness and the investigating officer attributed fault to the defendant. The defendant, however, denied negligence, testifying that her vehicle sustained no damage and she was unsure if contact occurred. She asserted she turned into the right lane, not the middle lane, and suggested the plaintiff may have drifted. The defense also argued the investigating officer did not witness the accident, that the corner lacked adequate lighting, and that the plaintiff's vehicle damage might have been pre-existing. The defense impeached the plaintiff regarding the time of day the accident occurred. The plaintiff claimed neck and back sprains, hip and shoulder injuries, headaches, a concussion, and post-concussion syndrome, undergoing treatment with a chiropractor, neurologist, and pain management specialist. The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical bills totaling over $37,000, along with non-economic damages. The defense countered by highlighting the plaintiff's extensive history of prior neck, back, and shoulder injuries and treatments. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that only a limited number of chiropractic visits were medically necessary due to the accident, estimating the related medical costs at approximately $2,000. After a one-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant solely negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $38,842.97 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
A minor sustained back, head, and neck injuries in a motor vehicle accident in Texas. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, alleging the incident caused the injuries and seeking damages. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from a neurologist specializing in pain management, a neuropsychologist, and an economist. The defense called an expert in aerospace and occupational medicine. The case concluded with an award of $27,255.