$11,211 Motor Vehicle Accident Case
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The impact pushed the second vehicle into a third vehicle. The driver of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their neck and shoulder. Medical records indicated neck and back sprains, headaches, and shoulder pain. Treatment included chiropractic care, physical therapy, and medication. The jury found the second driver's negligence caused the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $11,211
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On June 3, 2014, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on North Sam Houston Parkway in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 39-year-old mechanic, was stopped in an exit lane when his vehicle was rear-ended. The incident occurred after a third vehicle struck a second vehicle, forcing it into the plaintiff’s car. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained injuries to his neck and shoulder in the collision.
The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the third vehicle, alleging negligence in vehicle operation. Plaintiff’s counsel argued the defendant failed to control his speed and was inattentive, possibly distracted by drinking coffee when traffic stopped. The defendant's counsel countered, asserting that the defendant was not negligent and that there was no evidence demonstrating his vehicle's impact caused the intermediate vehicle to strike the plaintiff’s car. The driver of the intermediate vehicle did not testify.
Following the accident, the plaintiff sought treatment for neck and back sprains, headaches, and right shoulder pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment, physical therapy, MRIs, and trigger point injections. He claimed the injuries necessitated help with job duties and home tasks. The plaintiff sought to recover over $14,400 in past medical costs, along with damages for past and future pain and suffering, physical impairment, and mental anguish. Defendant’s counsel contended that the plaintiff’s medical treatment was related to pre-existing conditions. However, the defendant’s expert in orthopedic surgery testified during a video deposition that the accident could have worsened degenerative conditions and caused the plaintiff's whiplash and shoulder contusion.
After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, a Houston jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $11,210.96 for past medical costs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.