Dallas, Texas Jury Awards $42,002.98 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was in a four-vehicle rear-end collision on Interstate 35 near downtown Dallas. The police report indicated the last two drivers were at fault. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries and sought damages for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The defense questioned the credibility of the injury claims due to treatment gaps. The jury found one of the drivers negligent and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $42,003
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On January 28, 2014, a four-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Interstate 35 in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff, driving the lead vehicle, claimed she braked due to an unidentified 18-wheeler cutting off traffic ahead, resulting in her vehicle being struck from behind. She subsequently sought treatment for neck and back injuries.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the drivers of the three trailing vehicles, alleging negligence, including failure to maintain a proper lookout, excessive speed, following too closely, and failure to brake or turn in time. She also sued the owner of one of the vehicles for negligent entrustment, a claim later dropped. A central dispute in the case revolved around the order of impacts. The plaintiff testified she felt three distinct impacts, suggesting the second vehicle struck her first, then was struck by the third, which was then struck by the fourth. However, a police report indicated the second vehicle had stopped behind the plaintiff before the fourth vehicle rear-ended the third, pushing it into the second, and then into the plaintiff.
Attorneys for the third and fourth drivers questioned the plaintiff's account of an 18-wheeler, noting no other drivers observed it. The fourth driver, whose deposition was read to the jury, maintained he had stopped before impact, aligning with the police report. Defense counsel argued the plaintiff's presentation of alternative causation theories indicated a failure to meet the burden of proof. Both defense teams highlighted severe damage to the third vehicle, including airbag deployment, as evidence of its driver's excessive speed. They also challenged the plaintiff's claimed injuries and their severity, citing a 25-day delay in seeking initial chiropractic treatment and missed appointments.
Following a one-day trial and 2.25 hours of deliberation, the jury found only the driver of the third vehicle negligent. The plaintiff was awarded $42,002.98. The verdict suggested the jury accepted the defense's arguments regarding the third driver's responsibility for initiating the chain reaction, likely aligning with the police report's sequence of events and the evidence of that vehicle's impact severity.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
On April 26, 2013, a three-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Texas State Highway 75 in Plano. A Chevrolet Cobalt rear-ended a Nissan Maxima, causing the Maxima to then strike a Nissan Altima in front of it. The insurer of the Altima initially sued the drivers of the Maxima and the Cobalt for property damage, but these claims were resolved before trial. The driver of the Maxima, acting as the cross-plaintiff, then pursued claims against the driver of the Cobalt, who was the defendant, for personal injuries and property damage. The cross-plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control speed and maintain a safe distance. Following the incident, the cross-plaintiff reported neck and lower back pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment for two months. Medical imaging allegedly revealed disc bulges and protrusions, and a cervical strain/sprain. The cross-plaintiff sought approximately $12,000 for medical costs, along with damages for past pain, physical impairment, and property damage, claiming inability to continue weightlifting or assist his son in football. The defendant's counsel, whose client did not appear at trial, countered that the cross-plaintiff had initially rear-ended the Altima and then slowed, leading to the second impact. The defense also argued any injuries would have resolved post-treatment. After a one-day trial in Plano, a jury found the defendant negligent and that this negligence was a factual cause of injury to the cross-plaintiff. The jury awarded the cross-plaintiff $22,500. This included $7,500 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, $3,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for property damage.