Dallas Jury Awards $6,350 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. Both occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries, including neck and back strains, headaches, and nausea. One occupant also claimed a shoulder sprain, and the other claimed a disc protrusion in her neck. Medical treatment included emergency room visits, chiropractic care, and physical therapy. The defense argued the accident was too minor to have caused the claimed injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,350
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In June 2014, a sedan driven by one plaintiff, carrying her daughter as a passenger, was rear-ended by another sedan on Hampton Road in Dallas, Texas. The collision occurred when the plaintiffs' vehicle was stopped at a light at Fort Worth Avenue. The plaintiffs subsequently claimed multiple injuries, including neck and back sprains and strains, headaches, concussion, nausea, and insomnia for both individuals, along with a shoulder sprain for the daughter and a disc protrusion for the mother.
The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake or turn in time to prevent the collision. The defendant did not attend the trial, and the defense stipulated to liability for the incident itself. The plaintiffs sought damages totaling over $32,000 for past medical bills, as well as compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
During the trial, the plaintiffs described treating at an emergency room, followed by chiropractic care and physical therapy at an injury clinic, where the mother also received pain medication and an MRI showing the disc protrusion. They claimed ongoing pain at the time of trial. The defense, however, introduced expert testimony challenging the extent of the plaintiffs' injuries. A biomechanical expert testified that the accident was too minor to cause injury, comparing the vehicle's acceleration rate to that of a human cough. A chiropractic expert for the defense opined that while the mother's emergency room visit was reasonable, her subsequent treatments were medically unnecessary. The defense also questioned the daughter's emergency room visit, noting her lack of pain complaints until arriving at the hospital. The defendant stated she had stopped behind the plaintiffs before accidentally rolling forward and lightly bumping their vehicle.
After deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding a total of $6,350. The award included $4,850 for the mother's past medical costs and $1,000 for her past physical pain and mental anguish, along with $500 for the daughter's past physical pain and mental anguish. The jury's award was considerably less than the damages sought by the plaintiffs, suggesting the jury largely accepted the defense's arguments regarding the limited extent and causation of the claimed injuries, despite the defendant admitting fault for the collision.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
On April 26, 2013, a three-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Texas State Highway 75 in Plano. A Chevrolet Cobalt rear-ended a Nissan Maxima, causing the Maxima to then strike a Nissan Altima in front of it. The insurer of the Altima initially sued the drivers of the Maxima and the Cobalt for property damage, but these claims were resolved before trial. The driver of the Maxima, acting as the cross-plaintiff, then pursued claims against the driver of the Cobalt, who was the defendant, for personal injuries and property damage. The cross-plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control speed and maintain a safe distance. Following the incident, the cross-plaintiff reported neck and lower back pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment for two months. Medical imaging allegedly revealed disc bulges and protrusions, and a cervical strain/sprain. The cross-plaintiff sought approximately $12,000 for medical costs, along with damages for past pain, physical impairment, and property damage, claiming inability to continue weightlifting or assist his son in football. The defendant's counsel, whose client did not appear at trial, countered that the cross-plaintiff had initially rear-ended the Altima and then slowed, leading to the second impact. The defense also argued any injuries would have resolved post-treatment. After a one-day trial in Plano, a jury found the defendant negligent and that this negligence was a factual cause of injury to the cross-plaintiff. The jury awarded the cross-plaintiff $22,500. This included $7,500 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, $3,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for property damage.