Dallas Jury Awards $4,687 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway exit ramp when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. She later underwent breast reduction surgery, which she stated was necessary due to her back pain, and experienced complications from the surgery. The defense argued the surgery was not related to the accident and that her injuries did not limit her activities.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $4,687
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 15, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on an exit ramp of southbound U.S. Highway 75 in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff's 2013 Chevrolet Camaro was stopped in traffic when the defendant's 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-class coupe struck it from behind. A police report indicated the defendant failed to control speed. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent, citing claims such as failing to control speed, failing to keep a proper lookout, and driving while using a cell phone. The defendant stipulated to liability for the accident on the first day of trial.
The plaintiff sought damages for neck, back, and shoulder injuries. After initial treatment at an emergency room, the plaintiff underwent 1.5 years of treatment for soft-tissue strains and sprains. The plaintiff claimed to have eventually undergone bilateral breast reduction surgery, asserting it was necessary to alleviate back pain resulting from the accident, which then led to an infection requiring a second operation. The plaintiff sought $17,148 for past medical expenses, along with unspecified amounts for past and future physical pain and mental anguish, past physical impairment, and past physical disfigurement, including scarring from the surgery.
The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and the necessity of the breast reduction surgery. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that there was no relationship between the plaintiff's complaints and breast size, and that the surgery was neither indicated nor related to the collision. The defense argued that only $4,437 in medical expenses, covering initial orthopedic visits and physical therapy, was reasonable. The defense also presented evidence of the plaintiff's post-accident travels and social media photos to challenge claims of activity limitations and visible scarring.
After a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for 2.5 hours before returning a 10-2 verdict. The jury awarded the plaintiff $4,687. This award included $4,437 for past medical costs and $250 for past physical pain and mental anguish, aligning closely with the amounts suggested by the defense for necessary treatment related to the accident. The two dissenting jurors reportedly sought to award zero damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
On February 12, 2017, a plaintiff driving in Plano, Texas, slowed for traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV. The plaintiff reported sustaining back and neck injuries from the collision. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the SUV, the vehicle's owner, and their own insurer for first-party benefits. The claims against the driver and vehicle owner were later discontinued after it was determined they were uninsured. The case then proceeded against the insurer, which conceded liability, focusing the trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing scoliosis and caused new injuries, including radiating pain and a cervical disc herniation. Evidence showed the plaintiff sought emergency medical care on the day of the accident and subsequently underwent extensive treatment, including chiropractic sessions, pain management procedures like lumbar and cervical rhizotomies, and epidural steroid injections over a two-year period. A medical expert for the plaintiff testified that the pre-existing scoliosis made the spine more susceptible to injury and attributed the treatment and complaints prior to a later motorcycle accident to the February 2017 collision. The defense, while conceding liability for the collision, disputed the extent of the claimed damages. Defense counsel argued that the accident did not aggravate the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, that medical charges were excessive, and pointed to minimal damage to the vehicles and gaps in the plaintiff's treatment history. The defense suggested an award for only immediate medical expenses. After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $80,000. This amount included $35,000 for past medical costs, $22,500 for past physical pain, and $22,500 for past mental anguish.
On April 26, 2013, a three-vehicle rear-end collision occurred on Texas State Highway 75 in Plano. A Chevrolet Cobalt rear-ended a Nissan Maxima, causing the Maxima to then strike a Nissan Altima in front of it. The insurer of the Altima initially sued the drivers of the Maxima and the Cobalt for property damage, but these claims were resolved before trial. The driver of the Maxima, acting as the cross-plaintiff, then pursued claims against the driver of the Cobalt, who was the defendant, for personal injuries and property damage. The cross-plaintiff alleged the defendant failed to control speed and maintain a safe distance. Following the incident, the cross-plaintiff reported neck and lower back pain, undergoing chiropractic treatment for two months. Medical imaging allegedly revealed disc bulges and protrusions, and a cervical strain/sprain. The cross-plaintiff sought approximately $12,000 for medical costs, along with damages for past pain, physical impairment, and property damage, claiming inability to continue weightlifting or assist his son in football. The defendant's counsel, whose client did not appear at trial, countered that the cross-plaintiff had initially rear-ended the Altima and then slowed, leading to the second impact. The defense also argued any injuries would have resolved post-treatment. After a one-day trial in Plano, a jury found the defendant negligent and that this negligence was a factual cause of injury to the cross-plaintiff. The jury awarded the cross-plaintiff $22,500. This included $7,500 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, $3,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for property damage.