Beaumont Jury Awards $19.2M in 18-Wheeler Rear-End Collision
A college student's SUV began smoking and decelerating on Interstate 10. A tanker truck, traveling at high speed and carrying hazardous material, rear-ended the SUV. The collision propelled the SUV into a retaining wall. The driver of the SUV suffered injuries and claimed the truck driver was negligent due to speeding and fatigue. The defense argued the injured driver was also negligent for not moving to the shoulder.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $19,215,779
- County
- Jefferson County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In February 2017, an 18-wheeler tanker truck rear-ended a sport utility vehicle on Interstate 10 in Beaumont, Texas, after the SUV began to smoke and rapidly decelerate. The SUV's driver, a college student, suffered a head injury, and the vehicle was propelled into a retaining wall. The driver and the SUV's owner filed a lawsuit against the truck driver, his employer, Genesis Energy L.P., and related entities, alleging negligence in the truck's operation and in the employer's retention of the driver for hazardous material transport. The tanker was loaded with hydrogen sulfide.
The plaintiffs contended that the truck driver was speeding, fatigued, and operating a dangerous cargo vehicle negligently. Evidence presented included data from the tanker's engine control module, which indicated the driver was traveling 71 mph in a 60 mph zone just before the smoke appeared and 61 mph at impact. Video footage reportedly showed the driver exhibiting signs of fatigue, and a sleep study later revealed severe obstructive sleep apnea. Plaintiffs argued that the employer should have known of the driver's risks and history, which included prior speeding violations and a previous rear-end accident. The driver suffered a traumatic brain injury, multiple herniated discs, a torn rotator cuff, and torn knee ligaments, requiring surgery and impacting his ability to pursue a firefighting career.
The defense argued the SUV's driver was negligent for failing to move to the shoulder in the 12 seconds between the vehicle smoking and the impact, suggesting he bore one-third of the responsibility. The defense asserted the truck driver slowed upon seeing smoke and denied negligent retention, emphasizing no cargo spill occurred. They also disputed the severity and cause of the SUV driver's injuries, particularly the brain injury, citing a lack of documented loss of consciousness and the unreliability of a SPECT scan. Defense experts opined that neck and back injuries were soft-tissue only and not accident-related, and noted the plaintiff had prior knee surgery.
After a 13-day trial, the jury found the truck driver and Genesis Energy L.P. negligent, and Genesis Energy L.P. grossly negligent. The jury did not find the SUV driver negligent. The plaintiffs were awarded a total of $19,215,778.98 in damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Jefferson County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.
On December 11, 2017, a vehicle carrying two plaintiffs, a driver and a front-seat passenger, was struck from behind on Interstate 380 in Collin County, Texas. The plaintiffs subsequently sued the driver of the trailing vehicle, alleging negligence in the operation of her vehicle. The defendant driver conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely on the issues of the plaintiffs' injuries and damages. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back disc herniations, sought emergency room treatment, underwent chiropractic care, and reported residual pain and limitations in daily activities. They sought to recover damages for past and future medical costs, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future physical impairment. Following a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for two hours before awarding the driver plaintiff $25,016 in damages and the passenger plaintiff $25,273 in damages. The total award was $50,289.
One driver stopped for a school bus and was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The pickup truck driver was distracted by a cell phone call. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries. The case proceeded to trial against the pickup truck driver and his employer.
In Plano, Texas, a collision occurred on the President George Bush Turnpike when a loan officer, driving a Mercedes-Benz sedan, stopped at a yield sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff, the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, filed a lawsuit alleging negligence against the defendant, claiming failures to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake to prevent the accident. The defendant stipulated to liability, and the case proceeded to determine damages. The plaintiff claimed the accident caused a lumbar disc bulge, along with neck and left shoulder sprains and strains. She underwent chiropractic care and saw a pain management specialist, who recommended epidural steroid injections which she did not receive. The plaintiff testified that her lower back pain persisted, impacting her ability to bike with her daughter and run competitively. She sought nearly $21,000 for past medical bills, $1,880 for past lost wages, and additional damages for future medical care, future lost earnings, and past and future pain and impairment, totaling approximately $80,000. Her treating doctor testified that her back pain could require future chiropractic care. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages, arguing the impact was minor, citing minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. Defense counsel challenged the plaintiff's credibility, highlighting inconsistencies between her trial and deposition testimony regarding the impact's severity, and questioning her physical difficulties in court. A defense expert opined that the duration and cost of the plaintiff's medical treatment were excessive, and the defense noted all treatment was attorney-referred. The defense suggested an award of $5,000 for past medical bills and zero for other damages. After a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,721 for past medical bills only. However, due to a pre-existing high-low agreement between the parties, with parameters set between $20,000 and $49,500, the defendant's insurer paid the plaintiff $20,000, plus a portion of taxable costs.