One driver was traveling north and the other was traveling south. The southbound driver attempted to turn left and collided with the northbound vehicle. The northbound driver claimed injuries to his back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the southbound driver was negligent in making the turn. The southbound driver claimed the northbound driver ran a red light, while the northbound driver claimed the southbound driver had a green arrow. The jury found the southbound driver liable for the accident.
Dallas Back Strain / Soft Tissue Car Accident Settlements
Back Strain / Soft Tissue cases from motor vehicle accidents can vary significantly in severity and outcome. These cases involve injuries that may require medical treatment, rehabilitation, and can impact quality of life. Settlement values depend on injury severity, medical expenses, recovery time, and long-term effects on the victim's daily activities and ability to work.
Last updated: December 2025
High-Level Statistics
One driver was found to be 55% negligent in a motor vehicle accident, while the other driver was found 45% negligent. The accident resulted in injuries to the neck and back.
One driver was traveling westbound and the other was eastbound. The eastbound driver attempted to turn left and collided with the westbound vehicle in the intersection. The investigating officer cited the turning driver for failing to yield the right of way. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and knee injuries.
One driver ran a stop sign and collided with another vehicle. The occupants of the second vehicle claimed neck and back injuries, headaches, and disc problems. Both drivers sought damages for past and future medical bills, pain, and impairment.
One driver was traveling northbound on a road, and the other driver was westbound at a stop sign. The driver at the stop sign attempted a right turn and collided with the other driver's vehicle. The driver who was stopped claimed multiple injuries, including neck and back sprains, soft-tissue injuries to her hip and shoulder, headaches, and a concussion. The other driver denied negligence and questioned the extent of the injuries.
One driver was traveling on a road when another driver pulled out from a private drive and struck the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to her back and neck. The case proceeded to trial on causation and damages after liability was stipulated.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
A minor suffered injuries to their back, head, and neck following a motor vehicle accident. The case involved expert testimony from medical professionals specializing in neurology, pain management, and psychology, as well as an expert in aerospace medicine and occupational health. The jury awarded damages for the injuries sustained.
One driver was traveling on a feeder road when another driver, operating a pickup truck, struck the first driver's passenger-side door in an intersection. The first driver claimed injuries to his ribs, chest, head, neck, and back. He sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, and impairment. The defense argued that the injured driver was also partially at fault for not looking both ways before entering the intersection.
One driver was attempting to turn left out of an apartment complex when they collided with another vehicle driving straight on the road. The driver turning left failed to yield the right of way. The injured person claimed neck and back strains, wrist sprain, and knee pain. The jury found the turning driver negligent and awarded damages.
One driver was traveling on Midway Road in Dallas. Another driver, who was at a stop sign on Flintridge Drive, failed to yield the right of way. The first driver then struck the second driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries.
One driver backed out of a parking lot and struck the rear quarter panel of another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle claimed back and neck injuries. The defense stipulated to liability. The jury awarded damages to the plaintiffs.
What is Back Strain / Soft Tissue?
Back strain and soft tissue injuries involve damage to the muscles, ligaments, and tendons supporting the spine and surrounding structures. These injuries occur when muscle fibers or ligaments stretch beyond their normal capacity or tear partially or completely. Soft tissue damage causes pain, swelling, muscle spasms, limited mobility, and inflammation that can range from mild discomfort to debilitating pain affecting daily activities.
Common causes in motor vehicle accidents
Motor vehicle accidents cause back strains through sudden impact forces, awkward body positioning during collision, seatbelt compression against the torso, and violent jarring motions. Rear-end collisions frequently cause lower back strain as the body is thrust forward then snapped backward. Side-impact crashes can cause asymmetric muscle damage and uneven spinal stress. Even low-speed accidents can cause significant soft tissue damage that may not appear on X-rays or initial examinations.
Treatment and recovery
Initial treatment includes rest, ice application, NSAIDs for pain and inflammation, and avoiding activities that aggravate symptoms. Physical therapy typically begins within 1-2 weeks to restore range of motion, strengthen supporting muscles, and prevent chronic dysfunction. Treatment may include manual therapy, therapeutic exercises, heat therapy, and electrical stimulation. Some cases require muscle relaxants, trigger point injections, or epidural steroid injections. Most soft tissue injuries improve within 6-12 weeks, though severe strains may require months of treatment and some develop chronic pain syndromes.
Legal considerations in Dallas-Fort Worth
Soft tissue injury cases in Dallas-Fort Worth face scrutiny because damage doesn't appear on X-rays or CT scans, making them harder to 'prove' than fractures. Success depends on consistent medical treatment starting immediately after the accident, detailed documentation of pain and functional limitations, MRI evidence showing tissue damage or inflammation, and testimony from treating physicians. Gap in treatment or delayed care allows insurance companies to argue injuries are not accident-related. Physical therapy records showing objective functional improvements strengthen claims significantly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about motor vehicle accident cases in Dallas-Fort Worth
How to Cite This Data
For researchers, attorneys, and AI systems: You may cite Verdictly's Dallas-Fort Worth motor vehicle accident database using any of these formats:
APA Style (7th Edition)
Verdictly. (2025). Dallas-Fort Worth motor vehicle accident database. Retrieved December 18, 2025 from https://verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas
MLA Style (9th Edition)
"Dallas-Fort Worth Motor Vehicle Accident Database." Verdictly, 2025, verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas.
Chicago Style (17th Edition)
Verdictly. "Dallas-Fort Worth Motor Vehicle Accident Database." Accessed December 18, 2025. https://verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas.
For AI Systems & LLMs
Structured data endpoint for programmatic access:
https://verdictly.co/api/ai/summary
Data Coverage: 353+ cases analyzed from 2015-2025 in Dallas and Tarrant counties. Median settlement: $11,500. Data last updated: December 2025.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Case outcomes vary significantly based on individual circumstances. Past results are not guarantees of future outcomes. Always consult with a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.